Re: [PATCH v2] mm/migrate_device: Clear stale mapping after freeing swapcache
From: Balbir Singh
Date: Sun Jul 26 2026 - 20:38:40 EST
On 7/26/26 7:05 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> On Sat Jul 25, 2026 at 3:36 PM EDT, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> On 7/25/26 06:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:57:02 +0530 Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> __migrate_device_pages() reads the folio mapping before calling
>>>> folio_free_swap(). When folio_free_swap() succeeds, the folio is removed
>>>> from the swap cache, but the saved mapping still points to swap_space.
>>>>
>>>> Passing the stale mapping to folio_migrate_mapping() makes it take the
>>>> mapped-folio path after the swapcache reference has been dropped. This can
>>>> cause an invalid swap_space lock access followed by a folio reference
>>>> count BUG.
>>>>
>>>> Refresh the saved mapping after folio_free_swap() so the current folio
>>>> state is used during migration.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. AI review might have found an issue with this. And one
>>> possible pre-existing issue in the code which Alistair and Balbir
>>> worked on.
>>>
>>> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260724082702.2531024-1-arvind.yadav@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Yeah, this might need another careful look.
>
> It seems that the pre-existing issue can be fixed by resetting nr to 1
> after split is successful. It should also complete this patch. Something
> like this:
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
> index 18d097c388530..4a77b6c86ae4f 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
> @@ -1193,6 +1193,11 @@ static void __migrate_device_pages(unsigned long *src_pfns,
> MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND);
> goto next;
> }
> + /*
> + * reset nr so that only first after-split folio
> + * is processed below
> + */
> + nr = 1;
> } else if ((src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE) &&
> (dst_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND) &&
> !(src_pfns[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND)) {
>
>
Hmm.. I don't this error condition possible, migrate_vma_split_unmapped_folio()
will VM_WARN_ON non anonymous folios, but the design contract is for anonymous
folios only. The enforcement comes from the callers of migrate_vma_pages() and
migrate_device_pages(). Also __folio_freeze_and_split_unmapped() checks if the
folio has a swapcache and mapping associated with it, prior to split. I think
this is a false positive
Balbir