Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/intel: Panic on partial microcode update

[Nikolay Borisov]

On 7/24/26 01:42, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>   We aim not to set a policy either, but at this point we have become aware
> the CPU is in a bad state, so I think at the very least there needs to be
> a way for the site manager to configure handling according to their needs,
> and I think it should be killing the system by default.


For people who care that much about this, they likely are running huge 
fleets and already have daemons/agents(sic) which are monitoring dmesg 
and are taking actions accordingly. So that use case is not lost.