Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] s390/vfio_ccw: selectively expand io_mutex
From: Matthew Rosato
Date: Mon Jul 27 2026 - 22:13:41 EST
On 7/27/26 9:35 PM, Eric Farman wrote:
> The io_mutex was defined to serialize the io_regions, but then has
> also sort of been associated with the I/O themselves because of
> the close relationship they share.
>
> With the handful of races that are possible, the choices are either to:
> A) expand the scope of io_mutex to close these remaining windows, or
> B) reduce the scope of io_mutex to just io_region, and introduce a new
> lock mechanism for the remaining I/O resources
>
> This patch implements A, since B brings with it a lot more interactions
> that would need to be tracked and kept in a correct hierarchy.
>
> The biggest functional change is the introduction of a workqueue
> element for the cp_free() called out of fsm_notoper(), which is could
> be run in an interrupt context and thus cannot be acquiring mutexes.
Nit: re-word "which is could be run"
Also the wording here kind of implies you added fsm_notoper() in this
patch, but that was last patch - here you just made it use the io_mutex.
Otherwise LGTM.
>
> Fixes: 4f76617378ee ("vfio-ccw: protect the I/O region")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c | 2 +-
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h | 3 ++-
> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
> index f3015132d4b5..9269b54f5cfd 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_chp.c
> @@ -98,13 +98,13 @@ static ssize_t vfio_ccw_crw_region_read(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
> if (pos + count > sizeof(*region))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> crw = list_first_entry_or_null(&private->crw,
> struct vfio_ccw_crw, next);
>
> if (crw)
> list_del(&crw->next);
>
> - mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> if (i >= private->num_regions) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> index 5ef082b8289a..58722c4baa25 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c
> @@ -977,17 +977,23 @@ void cp_update_scsw(struct channel_program *cp, union scsw *scsw)
> */
> bool cp_iova_pinned(struct channel_program *cp, u64 iova, u64 length)
> {
> + struct vfio_ccw_private *private =
> + container_of(cp, struct vfio_ccw_private, cp);
> struct ccwchain *chain;
> int i;
>
> if (!cp->initialized)
> return false;
>
> + mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> list_for_each_entry(chain, &cp->ccwchain_list, next) {
> for (i = 0; i < chain->ch_len; i++)
> - if (page_array_iova_pinned(&chain->ch_pa[i], iova, length))
> + if (page_array_iova_pinned(&chain->ch_pa[i], iova, length)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
> return true;
> + }
> }
> + mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
>
> return false;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> index c197ad5ab580..757ff5b2556e 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
>
> is_final = !(scsw_actl(&irb->scsw) &
> (SCSW_ACTL_DEVACT | SCSW_ACTL_SCHACT));
> + mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> if (scsw_is_solicited(&irb->scsw)) {
> cp_update_scsw(&private->cp, &irb->scsw);
> if (is_final && private->state == VFIO_CCW_STATE_CP_PENDING) {
> @@ -98,9 +99,7 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
> cp_is_finished = true;
> }
> }
> - mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> memcpy(private->io_region->irb_area, irb, sizeof(*irb));
> - mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
>
> /*
> * Reset to IDLE only if processing of a channel program
> @@ -110,6 +109,7 @@ void vfio_ccw_sch_io_todo(struct work_struct *work)
> */
> if (cp_is_finished)
> private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_IDLE;
> + mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
>
> if (private->io_trigger)
> eventfd_signal(private->io_trigger);
> @@ -131,7 +131,9 @@ void vfio_ccw_notoper_todo(struct work_struct *work)
>
> private = container_of(work, struct vfio_ccw_private, notoper_work);
>
> + mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> cp_free(&private->cp);
> + mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
> index 4d47a3c7b9a0..5fd94e9d5c61 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_fsm.c
> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ static void fsm_notoper(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
> css_sched_sch_todo(sch, SCH_TODO_UNREG);
> private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_NOT_OPER;
>
> + /* This routine could be called from IRQ context, so defer */
> queue_work(vfio_ccw_work_q, &private->notoper_work);
> }
>
> @@ -409,7 +410,11 @@ static void fsm_close(struct vfio_ccw_private *private,
>
> private->state = VFIO_CCW_STATE_STANDBY;
> spin_unlock_irq(&sch->lock);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&private->io_mutex);
> cp_free(&private->cp);
> + mutex_unlock(&private->io_mutex);
> +
> return;
>
> err_unlock:
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
> index e2256402b089..739121116ab6 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_private.h
> @@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ struct vfio_ccw_parent {
> * @state: internal state of the device
> * @completion: synchronization helper of the I/O completion
> * @io_region: MMIO region to input/output I/O arguments/results
> - * @io_mutex: protect against concurrent update of I/O regions
> + * @io_mutex: protect against concurrent update of I/O resources
> + * and @cp lifecycle
> * @region: additional regions for other subchannel operations
> * @cmd_region: MMIO region for asynchronous I/O commands other than START
> * @schib_region: MMIO region for SCHIB information