Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Documentation: fix "should be use" grammar in ABI README

[Randy Dunlap]

On 7/27/26 9:24 PM, Weijie Yuan wrote:
> Hi 秉坤,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 12:12:11PM +0800, 岳秉坤 wrote:
>> Fix "should be use" -> "should use" in Documentation/ABI/README.
> 
> The diff below already documents that the changes is in
> "Documentation/ABI/README". I'm not sure if it is proper to write like
> this. But I also do not know what's the best practice to write commit
> messages for typos. Hope some friends could provide a better answer ;-)
> Of course, if the maintainer thinks it's okay, I'll be definitely fine
> with it.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: 岳秉坤 <yuebingkun@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Usually, your "Signed-off-by" should be the last trailer.

Hm, I disagree. The -by: lines are somewhat in chronological order, so this
looks fine to me.

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst says:
"""
Standard sign-off
procedure applies, i.e. the ordering of Signed-off-by: tags should reflect the
chronological history of the patch insofar as possible, regardless of whether
the author is attributed via From: or Co-developed-by:.  Notably, the last
Signed-off-by: must always be that of the developer submitting the patch.
"""

Yes, this doesn't address Acked-by: or Reviewed-by: lines, but in my experience,
chronological order applies to all of them.


>> ---
>>  Documentation/ABI/README | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/README b/Documentation/ABI/README
>> index 315fffe1f831f..27c962e6a872c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/README
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/README
> 
> Thanks.

-- 
~Randy