Re: [PATCH] docs: media: fix spelling errors

[shaikh kamaluddin]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:34:03PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please use Documentation: prefix for patches under Documentation/.
> 
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2026 at 12:24:07PM +0530, shaikh.kamal wrote:
> > Fix spelling errors reported by codespell:
> > 
> >   thare -> there  (vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst)
> >   stuct -> struct (legacy_dvb_video.rst)
> > 
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: shaikh.kamal <shaikhkamal2012@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Does this conform to the spelling of your name? Just confirming.
> 
> It needs to match From: nonetheless.
> 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst      | 2 +-
> >  .../userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst         | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst
> > index b9fd5cadae24..71d044605315 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst
> > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ Variables
> >  
> >      -  ..
> >  
> > -       -  :rspan:`5` ``stuct play``
> > +       -  :rspan:`5` ``struct play``
> >  
> >         -  :rspan:`4` ``__s32 speed``
> >  
> > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst
> > index 6f66ca38589e..164cf0ad3593 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst
> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ subdevice routing table. This may be smaller or larger than the value of
> >  drivers may adjust the requested routing table.
> >  
> >  The kernel can return a ``num_routes`` value larger than ``len_routes`` from
> > -both ioctls. This indicates thare are more routes in the routing table than fits
> > +both ioctls. This indicates there are more routes in the routing table than fits
> >  the ``routes`` array. In this case, the ``routes`` array is filled by the kernel
> >  with the first ``len_routes`` entries of the subdevice routing table. This is
> >  not considered to be an error, and the ioctl call succeeds. If the applications
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Sakari Ailus

Thanks for the review — sent v2 [1] with the Documentation: prefix and my
full name in From/Signed-off-by:
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260728145252.9326-1-shaikhkamal2012@xxxxxxxxx/

Shaikh Kamaluddin