Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: media: fix spelling errors

From: Sakari Ailus

Date: Tue Jul 28 2026 - 14:46:53 EST


Hi Shaikh,

On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 08:22:52PM +0530, Shaikh Kamaluddin wrote:
> Fix two spelling errors reported by codespell: a misspelling of
> "there" in vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst and a misspelling of
> "struct" in legacy_dvb_video.rst.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaikh Kamaluddin <shaikhkamal2012@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: - use Documentation: subject prefix (Sakari)
> - use full name in From/Signed-off-by (Sakari)
> - reword commit message so the media CI spell check doesn't
> trip on the typo being described
>
> Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst | 2 +-
> .../userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst
> index b9fd5cadae24..71d044605315 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/dvb/legacy_dvb_video.rst
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ Variables
>
> - ..
>
> - - :rspan:`5` ``stuct play``
> + - :rspan:`5` ``struct play``
>
> - :rspan:`4` ``__s32 speed``
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst
> index 6f66ca38589e..164cf0ad3593 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-routing.rst
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ subdevice routing table. This may be smaller or larger than the value of
> drivers may adjust the requested routing table.
>
> The kernel can return a ``num_routes`` value larger than ``len_routes`` from
> -both ioctls. This indicates thare are more routes in the routing table than fits
> +both ioctls. This indicates there are more routes in the routing table than fits
> the ``routes`` array. In this case, the ``routes`` array is filled by the kernel
> with the first ``len_routes`` entries of the subdevice routing table. This is
> not considered to be an error, and the ioctl call succeeds. If the applications
>
> base-commit: 1590cf0329716306e948a8fc29f1d3ee87d3989f
> prerequisite-patch-id: 912014811782d33538ddb17f00b64c15b364425e
> prerequisite-patch-id: ccd9499245f9528a029f13653f6a670c70796caa
> prerequisite-patch-id: dd62b9e9a5a590acea801e33ebcf110932d52a12
> prerequisite-patch-id: 604c7b67fbc5678938599f8dfc11621e9d6e7bad
> prerequisite-patch-id: 76849a9365b2ef77eae25f4ee42c11f124b1ea0d
> prerequisite-patch-id: a0d7b90a4a5e251a58aa682ce414c7048eb47bc7
> prerequisite-patch-id: 0208e7fa539736cc848ac91c09d7ca825b11d8f9
> prerequisite-patch-id: 7b1377967ede9d22f77df0171f54207067158e71
> prerequisite-patch-id: e39888d68322e429ea71d6ed6d49f4295fbbe14e
> prerequisite-patch-id: 7f0dcaca727eb421484eabd62e791b96b3721874
> prerequisite-patch-id: ff5dc6989d168666264e0eae2853f348a95d99b6
> prerequisite-patch-id: 301b88e47a5d4cdc17e2152ebaf134b3f6685902

These dependencies appear to be unrelated to the patch. Can you send v3
without these?

--
Sakari Ailus