Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] zstd: move ZSTD_MAX_CLEVEL to zstd_lib.h
From: haoqin huang
Date: Wed Jul 29 2026 - 00:21:10 EST
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:03 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
<senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On (26/07/28 17:29), Haoqin Huang wrote:
> [..]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/zstd_lib.h b/include/linux/zstd_lib.h
> > index e295d4125dde..f4b26844e53a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/zstd_lib.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/zstd_lib.h
> > @@ -1241,6 +1241,7 @@ ZSTDLIB_API size_t ZSTD_sizeof_DDict(const ZSTD_DDict* ddict);
> > #define ZSTD_SEARCHLOG_MIN 1
> > #define ZSTD_MINMATCH_MAX 7 /* only for ZSTD_fast, other strategies are limited to 6 */
> > #define ZSTD_MINMATCH_MIN 3 /* only for ZSTD_btopt+, faster strategies are limited to 4 */
> > +#define ZSTD_MAX_CLEVEL 22
> > #define ZSTD_TARGETLENGTH_MAX ZSTD_BLOCKSIZE_MAX
> > #define ZSTD_TARGETLENGTH_MIN 0 /* note : comparing this constant to an unsigned results in a tautological test */
> > #define ZSTD_STRATEGY_MIN ZSTD_fast
> > diff --git a/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h b/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h
> > index 6ab8be6532ef..06565e064456 100644
> > --- a/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h
> > +++ b/lib/zstd/compress/clevels.h
> > @@ -17,8 +17,6 @@
> >
> > /*-===== Pre-defined compression levels =====-*/
> >
> > -#define ZSTD_MAX_CLEVEL 22
> > -
> > __attribute__((__unused__))
>
> Sashiko made a good point. Can we use zstd_max_clevel() instead?
Good point, I'll drop this patch and use zstd_max_clevel() instead
in v3.
Since it's a runtime function and can't be used for static struct
initialization, I plan to set backend_zstd's level_max to -1 as a
sentinel value, and query the actual maximum in
zcomp_validate_params():
s32 max = backend->level_max;
if (max < 0)
max = zstd_max_clevel();
Do you think this approach is feasible?