Re: [PATCH] arm64: errata: Add NXP iMX8QM workaround for A53 cache coherency issue

From: Mark Rutland

Date: Wed Jul 29 2026 - 06:17:25 EST


On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:28:52AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> According to NXP errata document IMX8_1N94W[1], the i.MX8QuadMax SoC
> suffers from a serious cache coherency issue (ERR050104). The upper
> bits, above bit 35, of the ARADDR and ACADDR buses within the Arm A53
> subsystem have been incorrectly connected. This causes some TLBI and IC
> maintenance operations exchanged between the A53 and A72 core clusters
> to be corrupted.
>
> The workaround requires:
>
> - Downgrading targeted TLBI operations to broadcast-all variants.
> Instead of patching the low-level __TLBI_1 macro (which interferes
> with the REPEAT_TLBI workaround and causes excessive over-
> invalidation), redirect high-level TLB flush functions
> (flush_tlb_mm, __do_flush_tlb_range, flush_tlb_kernel_range,
> __flush_tlb_kernel_pgtable) to use VMALLE1IS via static key checks.
>
> - Upgrading IC IVAU to IC IALLUIS for both kernel (via ALTERNATIVE in
> invalidate_icache_by_line) and EL0 userspace (via trap-and-upgrade
> in user_cache_maint_handler with SCTLR_EL1.UCI=0).
>
> - Disabling KVM since correct TLB maintenance cannot be guaranteed
> for guests without the proper devicetree.
>
> - No need to touch SMMU Broadcast TLB Maintenance (BTM) since i.MX8QM
> does not support broadcast TLB.
>
> SoC detection uses devicetree compatible string "fsl,imx8qm" since the
> boot CPU MIDR_EL1 (0x410fd034) and AIDR_EL1 (0) are not unique to this
> SoC.
>
> [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/errata/IMX8_1N94W.pdf

[...]

> + if (alternative_has_cap_unlikely(ARM64_WORKAROUND_NXP_ERR050104)) {
> + __tlbi(vmalle1is);
> + } else {
> + switch (flags & (TLBF_NOWALKCACHE | TLBF_NOBROADCAST)) {
> + case TLBF_NONE:
> + __flush_s1_tlb_range_op(vae1is, start, pages, stride,
> + asid, tlb_level);
> + break;
> + case TLBF_NOWALKCACHE:
> + __flush_s1_tlb_range_op(vale1is, start, pages, stride,
> + asid, tlb_level);
> + break;
> + case TLBF_NOBROADCAST:
> + /* Combination unused */
> + BUG();
> + break;
> + case TLBF_NOWALKCACHE | TLBF_NOBROADCAST:
> + __flush_s1_tlb_range_op(vale1, start, pages, stride,
> + asid, tlb_level);
> + break;
> + }
> }

Are you sure the workaround needs to be applied for the TLBF_NOBROADCAST
cases? The NXP document lists non-broadcast TLBI instructions, but I
strongly suspect that's in error, as those shouldn't result in
transactions over the core's external interfaces.

[...]

> @@ -585,6 +585,12 @@ static void user_cache_maint_handler(unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> __user_cache_maint("dc civac", address, ret);
> break;
> case ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_CRM_IC_IVAU: /* IC IVAU */
> + if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_NXP_ERR050104)) {
> + /* ERR050104: upgrade IC IVAU to IC IALLUIS */
> + asm volatile("ic ialluis");
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> __user_cache_maint("ic ivau", address, ret);
> break;

This doesn't address my feedback on v1:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZIHisLL9FXlbuMLJ@FVFF77S0Q05N/

... which I see Sashiko has also spotted.

Please make this:

case ESR_ELx_SYS64_ISS_CRM_IC_IVAU: /* IC IVAU */
__user_cache_maint("ic ivau", address, ret)
if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_NXP_ERR050104) && !ret)
asm volatile("ic ialluis");
break;

If there's a reason that doesn't work, please explain that reason.

Mark.