Re: sound/soc/codecs/tac5xx2-sdw.c:984 tac5xx2_jack_init() warn: missing error code 'ret'
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed Jul 29 2026 - 06:36:42 EST
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 09:56:57AM +0000, Holalu Yogendra, Niranjan wrote:
> > On 11:16-20260729, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Subject: sound/soc/codecs/tac5xx2-sdw.c:984 tac5xx2_jack_init() warn: missing error code 'ret's
> >
> > smatch warnings:
> > sound/soc/codecs/tac5xx2-sdw.c:984 tac5xx2_jack_init() warn: missing error
> > code 'ret'
> >
> > vim +/ret +984 sound/soc/codecs/tac5xx2-sdw.c
> >
> > 38c89fededd5a9 Niranjan H Y 2026-05-05 979 static int tac5xx2_jack_init(struct tac5xx2_prv *tac_dev)
> > 38c89fededd5a9 Niranjan H Y 2026-05-05 980 {
> > 38c89fededd5a9 Niranjan H Y 2026-05-05 981 int ret = 0;
> > 38c89fededd5a9 Niranjan H Y 2026-05-05 982
> > 38c89fededd5a9 Niranjan H Y 2026-05-05 983 if (!tac_dev->hs_jack)
> > 38c89fededd5a9 Niranjan H Y 2026-05-05 @984 goto disable_interrupts;
> >
> > Is this supposed to be an error path? tac_dev->hs_jack can't be NULL
> > in real life.
>
> We added this as defensive strategy in case someone calls like this
> snd_soc_component_set_jack(component, NULL, NULL);
Should it return zero or an error code? I feel like it should
return an error code since it disables interrupts which
pretty much stops the driver.
regards,
dan carpenter