Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] ARM: tegra: tf701t: Fix BCM43341 WiFi/BT chip configuration
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel
Date: Wed Jul 29 2026 - 08:27:40 EST
ср, 29 лип. 2026 р. о 13:27 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 05:08:40PM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > вт, 28 лип. 2026 р. о 15:13 Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, July 21, 2026 7:10 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > > Drop reset GPIO from bluetooth part. Add lpo clock to both WiFi and
> > > > bluetooth nodes. Add 'brcm,bcm43340-fmac' as primary compatible and
> > > > 'brcm,bcm4329-fmac' remains as fallback.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114-asus-tf701t.dts | 13 ++++++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114-asus-tf701t.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114-asus-tf701t.dts
> > > > index 3de5c84d5f009..b71a02b3fd86f 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114-asus-tf701t.dts
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114-asus-tf701t.dts
> > > > @@ -1300,8 +1300,9 @@ bluetooth {
> > > > compatible = "brcm,bcm4334-bt";
> > > > max-speed = <4000000>;
> > > >
> > > > - clocks = <&tegra_pmc TEGRA_PMC_CLK_BLINK>;
> > > > - clock-names = "txco";
> > > > + clocks = <&tegra_pmc TEGRA_PMC_CLK_BLINK>,
> > > > + <&palmas_clk32k>;
> > > > + clock-names = "txco", "lpo";
> > > >
> > > > interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
> > > > interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(U, 6) IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > > > @@ -1309,7 +1310,6 @@ bluetooth {
> > > >
> > > > device-wakeup-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(EE, 1) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > > shutdown-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(Q, 7) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > > - reset-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(Q, 6) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate a note in the commit message on why this is dropped.
> > >
> >
> > It does not comply schema for "brcm,bcm4334-bt", further testing with
> > this reset gpio removed confirmed that it has nothing to do with
> > bluetooth and bluetooth works just fine without it.
>
> Maybe this should be a separate patch to make it obvious that this fixes
> a DTB validation issue. At the very least the commit message should say
> that this drop the reset GPIO because it's not part of the binding.
>
To be clear, I did not refuse to add note into commit message as Mikko
asked, I have just explained why this change was added.
I have included rese-gpio removal here since it logically can be
grouper with other manipulations with the bt/wifi chip binding. I
would like to avoid inflating patchset since it is already a big
series and tweaks to binding are small but significant. I will expand
commit descriptions for each change included but if you insist on
splitting this commit, I am perfectly fine with this too. Please let
me know.
> Thierry