Re: [PATCHv2] PCI: iproc: platform: use device functions instead of OF.

From: Rob Herring

Date: Wed Jul 29 2026 - 20:34:27 EST


On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 6:44 PM Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since this is supposed to be the higher layer file, use higher layer
> than OF to handle this. Remove OF headers as a result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: fix platform_get_resource() parameters.
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c | 31 ++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c
> index 4c9a0c4bb923..488ff737ec52 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c
> @@ -10,12 +10,8 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_address.h>
> -#include <linux/of_pci.h>
> -#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>
> -#include "../pci.h"
> #include "pcie-iproc.h"
>
> static const struct of_device_id iproc_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> @@ -40,11 +36,14 @@ static int iproc_pltfm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct iproc_pcie *pcie;
> - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> - struct resource reg;
> + struct resource *reg;
> struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> int ret;
>
> + reg = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!reg)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(*pcie));
> if (!bridge)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -52,26 +51,20 @@ static int iproc_pltfm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
>
> pcie->dev = dev;
> - pcie->type = (uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> -
> - ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &reg);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to obtain controller resources\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> + pcie->type = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(dev);
>
> - pcie->base = devm_pci_remap_cfgspace(dev, reg.start,
> - resource_size(&reg));
> + pcie->base = devm_pci_remap_cfgspace(dev, reg->start,
> + resource_size(reg));
> if (!pcie->base) {
> dev_err(dev, "unable to map controller registers\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> - pcie->base_addr = reg.start;
> + pcie->base_addr = reg->start;
>
> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,pcie-ob")) {
> + if (device_property_present(dev, "brcm,pcie-ob")) {

If the property is boolean, it should use read_bool and vice-versa.

> u32 val;
>
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "brcm,pcie-ob-axi-offset",
> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "brcm,pcie-ob-axi-offset",
> &val);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev,
> @@ -87,7 +80,7 @@ static int iproc_pltfm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * core driver. For platforms that require explicit inbound mapping
> * configuration, "dma-ranges" would have been present in DT
> */
> - pcie->need_ib_cfg = of_property_read_bool(np, "dma-ranges");
> + pcie->need_ib_cfg = device_property_present(dev, "dma-ranges");

This is correct as dma-ranges may not be bool.

Rob