Re: [PATCHv2] PCI: iproc: platform: use device functions instead of OF.

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 7:55 PM Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 5:32 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 6:44 PM Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Since this is supposed to be the higher layer file, use higher layer
> > > than OF to handle this. Remove OF headers as a result.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  v2: fix platform_get_resource() parameters.
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c | 31 ++++++++------------
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c
> > > index 4c9a0c4bb923..488ff737ec52 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c
> > > @@ -10,12 +10,8 @@
> > >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > -#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > > -#include <linux/of_pci.h>
> > > -#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > >  #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > >
> > > -#include "../pci.h"
> > >  #include "pcie-iproc.h"
> > >
> > >  static const struct of_device_id iproc_pcie_of_match_table[] = {
> > > @@ -40,11 +36,14 @@ static int iproc_pltfm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  {
> > >         struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > >         struct iproc_pcie *pcie;
> > > -       struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > -       struct resource reg;
> > > +       struct resource *reg;
> > >         struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> > >         int ret;
> > >
> > > +       reg = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > > +       if (!reg)
> > > +               return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > >         bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(*pcie));
> > >         if (!bridge)
> > >                 return -ENOMEM;
> > > @@ -52,26 +51,20 @@ static int iproc_pltfm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >         pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge);
> > >
> > >         pcie->dev = dev;
> > > -       pcie->type = (uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > -
> > > -       ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &reg);
> > > -       if (ret < 0) {
> > > -               dev_err(dev, "unable to obtain controller resources\n");
> > > -               return ret;
> > > -       }
> > > +       pcie->type = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(dev);
> > >
> > > -       pcie->base = devm_pci_remap_cfgspace(dev, reg.start,
> > > -                                            resource_size(&reg));
> > > +       pcie->base = devm_pci_remap_cfgspace(dev, reg->start,
> > > +                                            resource_size(reg));
> > >         if (!pcie->base) {
> > >                 dev_err(dev, "unable to map controller registers\n");
> > >                 return -ENOMEM;
> > >         }
> > > -       pcie->base_addr = reg.start;
> > > +       pcie->base_addr = reg->start;
> > >
> > > -       if (of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,pcie-ob")) {
> > > +       if (device_property_present(dev, "brcm,pcie-ob")) {
> >
> > If the property is boolean, it should use read_bool and vice-versa.
> I don't see it as a boolean in dtsi.

Looks like boolean to me:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/northstar2/ns2.dtsi:156:           brcm,pcie-ob;
arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/northstar2/ns2.dtsi:185:           brcm,pcie-ob;

Rob