Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Fix subbuf_ids memory leak in rb_allocate_cpu_buffer() error path

From: Vincent Donnefort

Date: Thu Jul 30 2026 - 04:32:15 EST


On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 04:01:51PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(), cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids is allocated using
> kcalloc() when buffer->remote is non-NULL. If a subsequent page allocation
> fails (e.g., ring_buffer_desc_page() returns NULL or rb_allocate_pages()
> fails), execution jumps to fail_free_reader.
>
> While __free(kfree) automatically frees the outer cpu_buffer structure
> at scope exit, kfree(cpu_buffer) does not recursively free nested heap
> pointers such as cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids, resulting in a memory leak.
>
> Fix this by explicitly freeing cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids in the
> fail_free_reader error unwinding path when cpu_buffer->remote is set.
>
> Fixes: 2e67fabd8b77 ("ring-buffer: Introduce ring-buffer remotes")
> Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.6-flash
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> index 78d3875a47a5..03f6baf6a5f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,8 @@ rb_allocate_cpu_buffer(struct trace_buffer *buffer, long nr_pages, int cpu)
> return_ptr(cpu_buffer);
>
> fail_free_reader:
> + if (cpu_buffer->remote)
> + kfree(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids);

alloc_cpu_buffer() being kzalloc, I suppose here we could just unconditionally
call kfree(cpu_buffer->subbuf_ids) ?

> free_buffer_page(cpu_buffer->reader_page);
>
> return NULL;
>

--
Vincent