Re: [PATCH v2] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after a

[Nguyen Dinh Phi [SG]]

On 29/7/26 21:19, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Should we do the same in other paths (e.g. send/recv) as well in a 
> follwup patch or in a series?
>
> The patch itself LGTM.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
That is a good point. I'll look into it and send a follow-up patch if it 
makes sense.

Thanks,
Phi