Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: document optional "memory-region-names"

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 09:34:09AM -0700, Laurentiu Mihalcea wrote:
> From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@xxxxxxx>
> 
> The carveout region names are derived based on the DT node names. Because
> of this, the DT node names are ABI, which is not supposed to happen.
> 
> Fix this by documenting an additional, optional property:
> "memory-region-names". This way, the software will have a way to build the
> carveout region names without relying on the DT node names.

That's not the point of xxx-names property. It only serves as a helper
to get the resource.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml         | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> index c18f71b64889..8e3e6676a95e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml
> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ properties:
>      minItems: 1
>      maxItems: 32
>  
> +  memory-region-names:
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 32

This cannot be flexible and unspecific. Why "yellow submarine" would be
a correct name?

Best regards,
Krzysztof