Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: macb: Rename MACB_CAPS_QBV to MACB_CAPS_TC

From: Théo Lebrun

Date: Fri Aug 07 2026 - 14:29:18 EST


Hello Vineeth & Conor,

On Fri Aug 7, 2026 at 7:09 PM CEST, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 03:20:09PM +0530, Vineeth Karumanchi wrote:
>> The MACB_CAPS_QBV capability flag was originally introduced to
>> gate TAPRIO/QBV support. However, GEM IP versions that support
>> QBV also implement multiple TSN clauses.
>>
>> Replace this with a generic capability flag that can be reused
>> by other TSN features. Rename MACB_CAPS_QBV to MACB_CAPS_TC to
>> better reflect its role as a general traffic-class offload capability.
>
> I'm not convinced that this is broadly correct, whether or not there's
> Qav support (which is what you're using the newly renamed flag for)
> depends on an IP configuration time define that I think is independent
> of whether or not there's Qbv support (gem_exclude_cbs).
>
> That said, the only platform that supports Qbv that I have the exact
> documentation for does not disable the CBS bits.

EyeQ5 instances have both active qbv and cbs as well.

I see two ways forward:
- MACB_CAPS_TC aggregating the two, coming from match data
- split and use runtime-detection, see DCFG1/0x0280 bits 1 and 24

What I like with 1 is that when reading code it's easy to see what
platform can use what features.

What I like with 2 is that it's less churn overall: no modification of
match data once support is merged.

I guess let's go with 2?

(I'll review the rest of the series later on.)

Thanks,

--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com