Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] platform: arm64: dell-xps-ec: new driver
From: Aleksandrs Vinarskis
Date: Sun Aug 09 2026 - 09:25:45 EST
On Saturday, August 1st, 2026 at 23:15, Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Bryan,
Thanks for review;
> On 01/08/2026 19:22, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
> > Introduce EC driver for Dell XPS 13 9345 (codename 'tributo') which may
> > partially of fully compatible with Snapdragon-based Dell Latitude,
> > Inspiron ('thena'). Primary function of this driver is unblock EC's
> > thermal management, specifically to provide it with necessary
> > information to control device fans, peripherals power.
> >
> > The driver was developed primarily by analyzing ACPI DSDT's _DSM and
> > i2c dumps of communication between SoC and EC. Changes to Windows
> > driver's behavior include increasing temperature feed loop from ~50ms
> > to 100ms here.
> >
> > While Xps's EC is rather complex and controls practically all device
> > peripherals including touch row's brightness and special keys such as
> > mic mute, these do not go over this particular i2c interface.
> >
> > Not yet implemented features:
> > - On lid-close IRQ event is registered. Windows performs what to
> > appears to be thermistor constants readout, though its not obvious
> > what it used for.
> > - According to ACPI's _DSM there is a method to readout fans' RPM.
> > - Initial thermistor constants were sniffed from Windows, these can be
> > likely fine tuned for better cooling performance.
> > - There is additional temperature reading that Windows sents to EC but
> > more rare than others, likely SoC T_j / TZ98 or TZ4. This is the only
> > thermal zone who's reading can exceed 115C without triggering thermal
> > shutdown.
> > - Given similarities between 'tributo' and 'thena' platforms, including
> > EC i2c address, driver can be potentially extended to support both.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ++
> > drivers/platform/arm64/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/platform/arm64/dell-xps-ec.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 282 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 9b5efed4c430..64e143bc5129 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -7347,6 +7347,7 @@ DELL XPS EMBEDDED CONTROLLER DRIVER
> > M: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > S: Maintained
> > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/embedded-controller/dell,xps13-9345-ec.yaml
> > +F: drivers/platform/arm64/dell-xps-ec.c
> >
> > DELTA AHE-50DC FAN CONTROL MODULE DRIVER
> > M: Zev Weiss <zev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig
> > index e32e01b2a9bd..29416f8d7232 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -33,6 +33,18 @@ config EC_ACER_ASPIRE1
> > laptop where this information is not properly exposed via the
> > standard ACPI devices.
> >
> > +config EC_DELL_XPS
> > + tristate "Dell XPS 9345 Embedded Controller driver"
> > + depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
> > + depends on I2C
> > + depends on IIO
> > + help
> > + Driver for the Embedded Controller in the Qualcomm Snapdragon-based
> > + Dell XPS 13 9345, which handles thermal management and fan speed
> > + control.
> > +
> > + Say M or Y here to include this support.
> > +
> > config EC_HUAWEI_GAOKUN
> > tristate "Huawei Matebook E Go Embedded Controller driver"
> > depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/Makefile b/drivers/platform/arm64/Makefile
> > index 7681be4a46e9..669dc9e79afb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/arm64/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/Makefile
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > #
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EC_ACER_ASPIRE1) += acer-aspire1-ec.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_EC_DELL_XPS) += dell-xps-ec.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EC_HUAWEI_GAOKUN) += huawei-gaokun-ec.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EC_LENOVO_YOGA_C630) += lenovo-yoga-c630.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_EC_LENOVO_THINKPAD_T14S) += lenovo-thinkpad-t14s.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/arm64/dell-xps-ec.c b/drivers/platform/arm64/dell-xps-ec.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..7758f5dd9342
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/arm64/dell-xps-ec.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2026, Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/array_size.h>
> > +#include <linux/dev_printk.h>
> > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > +#include <linux/devm-helpers.h>
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/iio/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm.h>
> > +#include <linux/unaligned.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > +
> > +#define DELL_XPS_EC_SUSPEND_CMD 0xb9
> > +#define DELL_XPS_EC_SUSPEND_MSG_LEN 64
> > +
> > +#define DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_CMD0 0xfb
> > +#define DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_CMD1 0x20
> > +#define DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_CMD3 0x02
> > +#define DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_MSG_LEN 6
> > +#define DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_POLL_JIFFIES msecs_to_jiffies(100)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Format:
> > + * - header/unknown (2 bytes)
> > + * - per-thermistor entries (3 bytes): thermistor_id, param1, param2
> > + */
> > +static const u8 dell_xps_ec_thermistor_profile[] = {
> > + 0xff, 0x54,
> > + 0x01, 0x00, 0x2b, /* sys_therm0 */
> > + 0x02, 0x44, 0x2a, /* sys_therm1 */
> > + 0x03, 0x44, 0x2b, /* sys_therm2 */
> > + 0x04, 0x44, 0x28, /* sys_therm3 */
> > + 0x05, 0x55, 0x2a, /* sys_therm4 */
> > + 0x06, 0x44, 0x26, /* sys_therm5 */
> > + 0x07, 0x44, 0x2b, /* sys_therm6 */
> > +};
>
> You ready have intuited this as a data-structure so if you define it as
> such with __attribute(packed); it will look neater.
>
I looked into it again, and I think its safer to assume that the init
sequence is a 'magic byte sequence' instead. The order and total amount
of thermistors does not match the data structure that is being sent on
regular intervals (off by one, short by one). I am also not sure it
would be the same across different platforms.
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Mapping from IIO channel name to EC command byte
> > + */
> > +static const struct {
> > + const char *name;
> > + u8 cmd;
> > +} dell_xps_ec_therms[] = {
> > + /* TODO: 0x01 is sent only occasionally, likely TZ98 or TZ4 */
> > + { "sys_therm0", 0x02 },
> > + { "sys_therm1", 0x03 },
> > + { "sys_therm2", 0x04 },
> > + { "sys_therm3", 0x05 },
> > + { "sys_therm4", 0x06 },
> > + { "sys_therm5", 0x07 },
> > + { "sys_therm6", 0x08 },
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct dell_xps_ec {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct i2c_client *client;
> > + struct iio_channel *therm_channels[ARRAY_SIZE(dell_xps_ec_therms)];
>
> This should come from data supplied via the probe .data and compat string.
Good idea, will rework.
>
> > + struct delayed_work temp_work;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int dell_xps_ec_suspend_cmd(struct dell_xps_ec *ec, bool suspend)
> > +{
> > + u8 buf[DELL_XPS_EC_SUSPEND_MSG_LEN] = {};
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + buf[0] = DELL_XPS_EC_SUSPEND_CMD;
> > + buf[1] = suspend ? 0x01 : 0x00;
> > + /* bytes 2..63 remain zero */
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_master_send(ec->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int dell_xps_ec_send_temp(struct dell_xps_ec *ec, u8 cmd_byte,
> > + int milli_celsius)
> > +{
> > + u8 buf[DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_MSG_LEN];
> > + u16 deci_celsius;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Convert milli-Celsius to deci-Celsius (Celsius * 10) */
>
> milli-Celsius is very strange hyphenation just use the lower-case kernel
> terminology for it millicelsius.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal.txt
Will fix.
>
> > + deci_celsius = milli_celsius / 100;
> > +
> > + buf[0] = DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_CMD0;
> > + buf[1] = DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_CMD1;
> > + buf[2] = cmd_byte;
> > + buf[3] = DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_CMD3;
> > + put_unaligned_le16(deci_celsius, &buf[4]);
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_master_send(ec->client, buf, sizeof(buf));
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dell_xps_ec_temp_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct dell_xps_ec *ec = container_of(work, struct dell_xps_ec,
> > + temp_work.work);
> > + int val, ret, i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dell_xps_ec_therms); i++) {
> > + if (!ec->therm_channels[i])
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + ret = iio_read_channel_processed(ec->therm_channels[i], &val);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err_ratelimited(ec->dev,
> > + "Failed to read thermistor %s: %d\n",
> > + dell_xps_ec_therms[i].name, ret);
> > + continue;
>
> Is it really legitimate to continue on in this case ? I'll leave it up
> to you to think about that for yourself, perhaps yes is the answer but
> if term_channels[i] is true and a read of a channel fails - surely
> that's indicative of a bail-out situation not read the next channel
> situation
I think, its still good to continue, since its probably better to have
some channels working than none. It is not failing silently, developer
will be able to see it.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = dell_xps_ec_send_temp(ec, dell_xps_ec_therms[i].cmd, val);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err_ratelimited(ec->dev,
> > + "Failed to send temp for %s: %d\n",
> > + dell_xps_ec_therms[i].name, ret);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&ec->temp_work, DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_POLL_JIFFIES);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t dell_xps_ec_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct dell_xps_ec *ec = data;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * TODO: IRQ is fired on lid-close. Follow Windows example to read out
> > + * the thermistor thresholds and potentially fan speeds.
> > + */
> > + dev_info_ratelimited(ec->dev, "IRQ triggered! (irq=%d)\n", irq);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int dell_xps_ec_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > + struct dell_xps_ec *ec;
> > + int ret, i;
> > +
> > + ec = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ec), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!ec)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + ec->dev = dev;
> > + ec->client = client;
> > + i2c_set_clientdata(client, ec);
> > +
> > + /* Set default thermistor profile */
> > + ret = i2c_master_send(client, dell_xps_ec_thermistor_profile,
> > + sizeof(dell_xps_ec_thermistor_profile));
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to set thermistor profile\n");
> > +
> > + /* Get IIO channels for thermistors */
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dell_xps_ec_therms); i++) {
>
> This should be num_channels passed from your compat .data
Will fix.
>
> > + ec->therm_channels[i] =
> > + devm_iio_channel_get(dev, dell_xps_ec_therms[i].name);
> > + if (IS_ERR(ec->therm_channels[i])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(ec->therm_channels[i]);
> > + ec->therm_channels[i] = NULL;
> > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + return ret;
> > + dev_warn(dev, "Thermistor %s not available: %d\n",
> > + dell_xps_ec_therms[i].name, ret);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Start periodic temperature reporting */
> > + ret = devm_delayed_work_autocancel(dev, &ec->temp_work,
> > + dell_xps_ec_temp_work_fn);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> \n
>
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&ec->temp_work, DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_POLL_JIFFIES);
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "Started periodic temperature reporting to EC every %d ms\n",
> > + jiffies_to_msecs(DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_POLL_JIFFIES));
> > +
> > + /* Request IRQ for EC events */
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq, NULL,
> > + dell_xps_ec_irq_handler,
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), ec);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to request IRQ\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
>
> You aren't returning the ret.
Good catch, switched to `if (ret)` with `return 0;` in the end instead
to match existing implementations.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Notify EC of suspend
> > + *
> > + * This will:
> > + * - Cut power to display/trackpad/keyboard/touchrow, wake-up source still works
> > + */
> > +static int dell_xps_ec_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct dell_xps_ec *ec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ec->temp_work);
> > +
> > + return dell_xps_ec_suspend_cmd(ec, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Notify EC of resume
> > + *
> > + * This will undo the suspend actions
> > + * Without the resume signal, device would wake up but be forced back into
> > + * suspend by EC within seconds
> > + */
> > +static int dell_xps_ec_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct dell_xps_ec *ec = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = dell_xps_ec_suspend_cmd(ec, false);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + schedule_delayed_work(&ec->temp_work, DELL_XPS_EC_TEMP_POLL_JIFFIES);
> \n> + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id dell_xps_ec_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "dell,xps13-9345-ec" },
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dell_xps_ec_of_match);
> > +
> > +static const struct i2c_device_id dell_xps_ec_i2c_id[] = {
> > + { "dell-xps-ec" },
>
> A nice .data will allow extension of this to other systems with
> more/less channels.
>
> Which is why you shouldn't use the ARRAY_SIZE() extents from statics
> declared up top directly.
Indeed, will fix.
Thanks,
Alex
>
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, dell_xps_ec_i2c_id);
> > +
> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops dell_xps_ec_pm_ops = {
> > + SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dell_xps_ec_suspend, dell_xps_ec_resume)
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct i2c_driver dell_xps_ec_driver = {
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "dell-xps-ec",
> > + .of_match_table = dell_xps_ec_of_match,
> > + .pm = &dell_xps_ec_pm_ops,
> > + },
> > + .probe = dell_xps_ec_probe,
> > + .id_table = dell_xps_ec_i2c_id,
> > +};
> > +module_i2c_driver(dell_xps_ec_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Dell XPS 13 9345 Embedded Controller");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("IIO_CONSUMER");
> >
>
>