Re: [PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf/selftests: fix comment style in network_helpers.c

Next message: bot+bpf-ci: "Re: [PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: allocate a larger timeout for connection"
Previous message: mambaxin: "[PATCH] mm: swap_cgroup: fix NULL deref in lookup_swap_cgroup_id on swapless host"
In reply to: Alexis Lothor&#xE9; (eBPF Foundation): "[PATCH bpf v5 1/2] bpf/selftests: fix comment style in network_helpers.c"
Next in thread: Alexis Lothor&#xE9; (eBPF Foundation): "[PATCH bpf v5 2/2] selftests/bpf: allocate a larger timeout for connection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: bot+bpf-ci

Date: Fri Aug 14 2026 - 03:50:24 EST

> bpf/selftests: fix comment style in network_helpers.c
>
> BPF subsystem requires multi-line comments to have the opening /* start
> on its own line.
>
> Update multi-line comments in network_helpers.c to follow this
> requirement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@xxxxxxxxxxx>

This isn't a bug, but would 'selftests/bpf:' be the expected subject
prefix here? The rest of the directory uses that convention (351
occurrences of 'selftests/bpf:' versus 0 of 'bpf/selftests:' in the
recent history), and the following patch in this series uses
'selftests/bpf:'.

---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/31779510003