Re: [PATCH v1] ata: libata-eh: Add timeout table entry for STANDBY IMMEDIATE

From: Niklas Cassel

Date: Fri Aug 14 2026 - 07:06:51 EST


On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 11:58:46AM +0800, Xingui Yang wrote:
> ATA_CMD_STANDBYNOW1 is not in the ata_eh_cmd_timeout_table and falls
> back to the 5s default (ATA_EH_CMD_DFL_TIMEOUT), which is too short
> for some drives to complete a STANDBY IMMEDIATE command issued from
> ata_dev_power_set_standby() via ata_exec_internal():
>
> ata1.00: qc timeout after 5000 msecs (cmd 0xe0)
> ata1.00: STANDBY IMMEDIATE failed (err_mask=0x4)
>
> Reuse the existing ata_eh_flush_timeouts for this command, as a drive
> entering standby may need to flush its internal cache, making the flush
> timeout a natural fit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/libata.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> index 05df7ea6954a..8f9e12f460c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ ata_eh_cmd_timeout_table[ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE] = {
> .timeouts = ata_eh_flush_timeouts },
> { .commands = CMDS(ATA_CMD_VERIFY),
> .timeouts = ata_eh_reset_timeouts },
> + { .commands = CMDS(ATA_CMD_STANDBYNOW1),
> + .timeouts = ata_eh_flush_timeouts },
> };
> #undef CMDS
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
> index 96e626d6a7ca..6c0d385b2cde 100644
> --- a/include/linux/libata.h
> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ enum {
> /* This should match the actual table size of
> * ata_eh_cmd_timeout_table in libata-eh.c.
> */
> - ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE = 8,
> + ATA_EH_CMD_TIMEOUT_TABLE_SIZE = 9,
>
> /* User visible DMA mask for DMA control. DO NOT renumber. */
> ATA_DMA_MASK_ATA = (1 << 0), /* DMA on ATA Disk */
> --
> 2.43.0
>

This patch does not seem to be on top of latest Linus tree.

If you look at latest Linus tree, it already has:
1e024d2b41ee ("ata: libata-eh: Increase STANDBY IMMEDIATE timeout")

Which looks to solve the same problem as this patch.


Kind regards,
Niklas