Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] iio: accel: adxl367: add support for INT2 interrupt pin

From: Nuno Sá

Date: Fri Aug 14 2026 - 08:27:49 EST


On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 11:14:52 +0300, Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c
> index 8c3de11a10a3..df385740b17b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl367.c
> @@ -1426,6 +1430,31 @@ static int adxl367_setup(struct adxl367_state *st)
> return adxl367_set_measure_en(st, true);
> }
>
> +static int adxl367_set_int_map_reg(struct adxl367_state *st)
> +{
> + int irq;
> +
> + irq = fwnode_irq_get_byname(dev_fwnode(st->dev), "INT1");
> + if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return irq;
> + if (irq > 0) {
> + st->int_map_reg = ADXL367_REG_INT1_MAP;
> + return 0;

sashiko point is sensible but I guess both INT ouputs are pretty much
the same? So even even if there's a mismatch against spi/i2c I guess
it is not problematic?

- Nuno Sá

--
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>