Re: [PATCH 1/5] iio: humidity: hts221: report available values via read_avail()

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:40:05 +0800
Adinata Tan <adinatatan99@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jonathan,
> Thanks for the input. In this case, we can proceed with the current
> implementation?
Busy week so sorry for slow reply.

Yes, that's fine and what I assume you did for v2!

Jonathan

> 
> > > For this humidity case in particular, would it be better to keep the legacy
> > > implementation while adding the new read_avail()?  
> >
> > To me it seems vanishingly unlikely there is any code out there jumping
> > through the hoops to read the wrong ABI element to figure out a possible
> > value to write to in_humidityrelative_oversampling_ratio
> >
> > So I think this is in the category of ABI that we can change as long
> > as no one notices.  For IIO I will also generally take ABI fixes on
> > basis we actually want to know if anyone is using the broken ABI
> > (and they very rarely are!)