Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] iio: light: veml6031x00: add support for events and trigger
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Aug 18 2026 - 10:02:09 EST
On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 01:34:29PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The device provides a shared interrupt line to notify events and
> data ready.
>
> Add support for configurations with and without an interrupt line,
> providing events and trigger support when an interrupt line is available.
...
> +static int veml6031x00_write_period(struct iio_dev *iio, int val)
> +{
> + struct veml6031x00_data *data = iio_priv(iio);
> +
> + if (val < 0 || val > 8 || hweight8(val) != 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return regmap_field_write(data->rf.pers, ffs(val) - 1);
That ffs() was bothering me all these review rounds. Now I got the idea how to
improve
if (val < 0 || val > 8 || !is_power_of_2(val))
return -EINVAL;
return regmap_field_write(data->rf.pers, ilog2(val));
> +}
...
> +static irqreturn_t veml6031x00_irq(int irq, void *private)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *iio = private;
> + struct veml6031x00_data *data = iio_priv(iio);
> + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
> + s64 timestamp;
> + unsigned int regval;
> + int ret;
> + bool trigger_poll;
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_if_active(dev);
> + if (ret <= 0)
< 0 seems too much to me. If there is disabled runtime PM (and supposedly
device is always on) this prevents from getting events.
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &data->irq_lock) {
> + ret = regmap_read(data->regmap, VEML6031X00_REG_INT, ®val);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to read interrupt register %d\n", ret);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> + }
> +
> + if (!(regval & VEML6031X00_INT_MASK)) {
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> + }
> +
> + timestamp = iio_get_time_ns(iio);
> + if ((regval & (VEML6031X00_INT_TH_H | VEML6031X00_INT_TH_L)) &&
> + data->ev_en) {
With swapped operands it might be easier to follow.
if (data->ev_en &&
(regval & (VEML6031X00_INT_TH_H | VEML6031X00_INT_TH_L))) {
> + if (regval & VEML6031X00_INT_TH_H)
> + iio_push_event(iio,
> + IIO_UNMOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_LIGHT, 0,
> + IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
> + IIO_EV_DIR_RISING),
> + timestamp);
> + if (regval & VEML6031X00_INT_TH_L)
> + iio_push_event(iio,
> + IIO_UNMOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_LIGHT, 0,
> + IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH,
> + IIO_EV_DIR_FALLING),
> + timestamp);
> + }
> +
> + trigger_poll = (regval & VEML6031X00_INT_DRDY) && data->trig_en;
Ditto.
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * iio_trigger_poll_nested() must be called with irq_lock released:
> + * it runs trig_handler() synchronously in this thread, which calls
> + * reenable() on completion, and that callback also takes irq_lock.
> + * iio_pollfunc_store_time() is not called for our own trigger, so the
> + * timestamp is stored here.
> + */
> + if (trigger_poll) {
> + iio->pollfunc->timestamp = timestamp;
> + iio_trigger_poll_nested(data->trig);
> + }
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
With the above this needs to be conditional like
if (pm_status > 0)
pm_runtime_put(dev);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
...
> +static int veml6031x00_hw_init(struct veml6031x00_data *data)
> +{
> + struct regmap *map = data->regmap;
> + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(map);
> + __le16 regval = 0;
Redundant assignment.
> + int ret, val;
Why is 'val' signed?
> + ret = regmap_bulk_write(map, VEML6031X00_REG_WL_L, ®val, sizeof(regval));
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to set low threshold\n");
> +
> + regval = cpu_to_le16(U16_MAX);
> + ret = regmap_bulk_write(map, VEML6031X00_REG_WH_L, ®val, sizeof(regval));
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to set high threshold\n");
> +
> + ret = regmap_field_write(data->rf.int_en, 0);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(map, VEML6031X00_REG_INT, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to clear interrupts\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
...
> +static int veml6031x00_init_iiodev(struct i2c_client *i2c, struct iio_dev *iio)
> +{
> + struct veml6031x00_data *data = iio_priv(iio);
> + struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
> + int ret;
> +
> + iio->name = data->chip->name;
> + iio->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> +
> + if (!i2c->irq) {
> + iio->channels = veml6031x00_channels;
> + iio->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(veml6031x00_channels);
> + iio->info = &veml6031x00_info_no_irq;
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + iio->channels = veml6031x00_channels_irq;
> + iio->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(veml6031x00_channels_irq);
> + iio->info = &veml6031x00_info;
> +
> + ret = veml6031x00_setup_irq(i2c, iio);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, veml6031x00_disable_event_action, data);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
return devm_add_action_or_reset(...);
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko