Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Maili SoC compatible

[Yijie Yang]

On 8/19/2026 2:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/08/2026 08:28, Yijie Yang wrote:
> > On 8/19/2026 2:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 19/08/2026 07:42, Prasad Kumpatla wrote:
> > > > From: Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Add the qcom,maili SoC compatible string to the QCOM SoC bindings.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yijie Yang <yijie.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 3 +++
> > > >    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > > > index ff8a35df7862..00d9a493fe76 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > > > @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ properties:
> > > >                  - qcom,kaanapali-qrd
> > > >              - const: qcom,kaanapali
> > > >    
> > > > +      - items:
> > > > +          - const: qcom,maili
> > >
> > > Heh? This cannot go alone.
> >
> > Keep only the SoC compatible string and exclude the board for now, as
> > the latter is not currently used.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260622-brainy-rapid-tody-dd7c3a@quoll/
>
> No, read my message there - this should be rejected! I even wrote:
>
> "But if ever this commit is used in argument "oh, compatible without
> user was accepted here by Krzysztof, so I can do the same", I will
> simply NAK such future contribution without reading the rest."
>
> So NAK because you did not even bother to read what I already stated!

In patch 2/2, pd-mapper serves as the user. Is there any other reason to 
reject this binding?

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

--
Best Regards,
Yijie