Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Maili SoC compatible

From: Konrad Dybcio

Date: Wed Aug 19 2026 - 05:11:04 EST


On 8/19/26 11:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/08/2026 10:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 8/19/26 9:02 AM, Yijie Yang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/19/2026 2:35 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 19/08/2026 08:28, Yijie Yang wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>>>>>> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ properties:
>>>>>>>                  - qcom,kaanapali-qrd
>>>>>>>              - const: qcom,kaanapali
>>>>>>>    +      - items:
>>>>>>> +          - const: qcom,maili
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heh? This cannot go alone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Keep only the SoC compatible string and exclude the board for now, as
>>>>> the latter is not currently used.
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260622-brainy-rapid-tody-dd7c3a@quoll/
>>>>
>>>> No, read my message there - this should be rejected! I even wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "But if ever this commit is used in argument "oh, compatible without
>>>> user was accepted here by Krzysztof, so I can do the same", I will
>>>> simply NAK such future contribution without reading the rest."
>>>>
>>>> So NAK because you did not even bother to read what I already stated!
>>>
>>> In patch 2/2, pd-mapper serves as the user. Is there any other reason to reject this binding?
>>
>> This defines/allows a top-level compatible of
>>
>> compatible = "qcom,maili";
>>
>> which is missing the board part, and that is strictly required.
>
> Not sure if you are agreeing with me or disagreeing...

Agreeing - I'm saying that we need the board compatible to be present
in the tuple, which the submission doesn't contain

Konrad