Re: [PATCH] kernfs: recheck of->released after acquiring the active reference
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Aug 20 2026 - 13:56:26 EST
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 02:18:10AM +0000, Fan Wu wrote:
> @@ -73,12 +73,22 @@ static struct kernfs_open_node *of_on(struct kernfs_open_file *of)
> /* Get active reference to kernfs node for an open file */
> static struct kernfs_open_file *kernfs_get_active_of(struct kernfs_open_file *of)
> {
> - /* Skip if file was already released */
> - if (unlikely(of->released))
> + if (!kernfs_get_active(of->kn))
> return NULL;
>
> - if (!kernfs_get_active(of->kn))
> + /*
> + * @of->released is set under kernfs_open_file_mutex. While the
> + * active reference is held, @kn can't be drained anymore and
> + * kernfs_fop_release() can't run, so re-reading @of->released
> + * here settles whether @of was released for good.
> + */
> + mutex_lock(kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(of->kn));
> + if (unlikely(of->released)) {
> + mutex_unlock(kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(of->kn));
> + kernfs_put_active(of->kn);
> return NULL;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(kernfs_open_file_mutex_ptr(of->kn));
"lock -> test something -> unlock" pattern is usually unnecessary. What's
the mutex achieving doing? Doesn't kernfs_get_active() already have strong
enough memory barrier? If not, it'd be better to solve it by iterlocking
kernfs_get_active() and released clearing.
Thanks.
--
tejun