Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Fri Aug 21 2026 - 04:33:49 EST
On Fri 21-08-26 16:17:37, Ridong Chen wrote:
> From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> min_unmapped_pages and min_slab_pages are documented as per-type limits,
> but node reclaim treats them as one combined gate: once either is
> exceeded, shrink_node() reclaims slab, file and anon together and pushes
> the other type below its limit. Per-node proactive reclaim reuses the
> same gate and fares worse -- with page cache and slab both under their
> limits it reclaims nothing and returns -EAGAIN on an anon-heavy node [1].
>
> This series gates each type separately via two scan_control flags
> (skip_slab_reclaim, skip_file_reclaim) set only on the node reclaim path,
> drops the combined gate, and extends node_reclaim()'s early bail to check
> anon. The flags default to zero, so kswapd, direct, memcg and drop_caches
> are unaffected.
You are explaining what but missing the most important part _Why_ do we
need to have this addressed? Is this just addressing Sashiko review
refernced below? Is there any real usecase where the current behavior
matters?
> Tested on QEMU (x86_64, 2 NUMA nodes), A/B kernels differing only in this
> series.
>
> Proactive reclaim (echo to node/reclaim) on an anon-heavy node, file and
> slab under their limits:
>
> metric before after
> ----------------- ------ -----------
> pages reclaimed 0 MiB 254 MiB anon
> return value -EAGAIN 0
>
> Node reclaim (zone_reclaim_mode) with one type under its limit -- the type
> under its limit must be left alone:
>
> type under limit before after
> ----------------- ------------- --------
> slab 645 scans 0 scans
> page cache 83 MiB scanned 0 MiB
>
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723045718.2052070-1-ridong.chen@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Ridong Chen (4):
> mm/vmscan: only reclaim slab in node reclaim when over min_slab_pages
> mm/vmscan: only reclaim file pages in node reclaim when over
> min_unmapped_pages
> mm/vmscan: drop the combined limit gate in __node_reclaim()
> mm/vmscan: do not skip node reclaim when only anon is reclaimable
>
> mm/vmscan.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs