Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] net: stmmac: Migrate IRQ balancing to cpumask_local_spread()
From: Florian Bezdeka
Date: Fri Aug 21 2026 - 12:40:30 EST
Hi Yury,
On Wed, 2026-08-19 at 14:45 -0400, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2026 at 04:30:32PM +0200, Florian Bezdeka wrote:
> > The previous balancing mechanism was based on num_online_cpus(), which
> > is a problem for systems cpu-isolating workloads. IRQs were targeting
> > CPUs that were isolated for those sensitive workloads.
> >
> > With a migration to cpumask_local_spread() we
> > - get NUMA locality
> > - honor the default SMP affinity mask, which avoids targeting
> > isolated CPUs.
> >
> > This also aligns with the pattern used by most network drivers dealing
> > with IRQ affinities / affinity hints.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezdeka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > index a71f0df263785dd8badc45292ca3067ab33bda05..949ced7e46d2814b57c6bd86b4886ac3bf33996c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > @@ -3826,11 +3826,16 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct net_device *dev)
> > struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> > struct stmmac_msi *msi = priv->msi;
> > enum request_irq_err irq_err;
> > + cpumask_var_t affinity;
> > int irq_idx = 0;
> > char *int_name;
> > + int node;
> > int ret;
> > int i;
> >
> > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&affinity, GFP_KERNEL))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > /* For common interrupt */
> > int_name = msi->int_name_mac;
> > sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "mac");
> > @@ -3916,6 +3921,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct net_device *dev)
> > }
> >
> > /* Request Rx MSI irq */
> > + node = dev_to_node(&priv->dev->dev);
> > for (i = 0; i < priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use; i++) {
> > if (i >= MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES)
> > break;
> > @@ -3935,8 +3941,10 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi(struct net_device *dev)
> > irq_idx = i;
> > goto irq_error;
> > }
> > - irq_set_affinity_hint(msi->rx_irq[i],
> > - cpumask_of(i % num_online_cpus()));
> > +
> > + cpumask_clear(affinity);
> > + cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_local_spread(i, node), affinity);
> > + irq_set_affinity_and_hint(msi->rx_irq[i], affinity);
>
> If you want to spread more than one IRQ, you'd better convert your
> loop into for_each_numa_hop_mask(). That way you don't need to
> introduce new function. See the comment on top of
> cpumask_local_spread():
>
I was knowingly ignoring this "optimization". As already noted the patch
1 thread: I'm currently trying to demonstrate the shortcomings,
optimizations will follow once we agree on a plan / vision.