Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iio: accel: bmc150: use aligned scan buffer for both trigger and fifo

From: Jonathan Cameron

Date: Sat Aug 22 2026 - 17:56:35 EST


On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 23:27:26 +0530
Yash Suthar <yashsuthar983@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Drop buffer as duplicate and s16 is not correct we needed __le16 as little
> endian, keep scan at the end of the bmc150_accel_data struct with
> IIO_DMA_MINALIGN, and use it for both paths.
>
> Fixes: bd7fe5b71918 ("iio: accel: BMC150 accel support")
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yash Suthar <yashsuthar983@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.h | 14 +++++---------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> index dc8a6285cf3d..89a475ef9a9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c
> @@ -1191,12 +1191,12 @@ static irqreturn_t bmc150_accel_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>
> mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, BMC150_ACCEL_REG_XOUT_L,
> - data->buffer, AXIS_MAX * 2);
> + data->scan.channels, AXIS_MAX * 2);

Even nicer if you replace AXIS_MAX * 2 with sizeof(data->scan.channels)
and also drop the AXIS_MAX definition as no longer used.


> mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto err_read;
>
> - iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, data->buffer,
> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &data->scan,
> pf->timestamp);
> err_read:
> iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.h b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.h
> index e8f26198359f..9deff256aed5 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.h
> @@ -64,15 +64,6 @@ struct bmc150_accel_data {
> struct bmc150_accel_trigger triggers[BMC150_ACCEL_TRIGGERS];
> struct mutex mutex;
> u8 fifo_mode, watermark;
> - s16 buffer[8];
> - /*
> - * Ensure there is sufficient space and correct alignment for
> - * the timestamp if enabled
> - */
> - struct {
> - __le16 channels[3];
> - aligned_s64 ts;
> - } scan;
> u8 bw_bits;
> u32 slope_dur;
> u32 slope_thres;
> @@ -85,6 +76,11 @@ struct bmc150_accel_data {
> void (*resume_callback)(struct device *dev);
> struct delayed_work resume_work;
> struct iio_mount_matrix orientation;
> + /* Ensure correct alignment of timestamp and DMA safety */
> + struct {
> + __le16 channels[3];
> + aligned_s64 ts;
> + } scan __aligned(IIO_DMA_MINALIGN);
> };
>
> int bmc150_accel_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,