Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: refcount the weighted interleave state instead of copying it

From: Matthew Wilcox

Date: Sun Aug 23 2026 - 23:06:27 EST


On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 10:41:17PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> @@ -2632,7 +2654,7 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
> unsigned long nr_allocated = 0;
> unsigned long rounds;
> unsigned long node_pages, delta;
> - u8 *weights, weight;
> + u8 *table, weight;
> unsigned int weight_total = 0;
> unsigned long rem_pages = nr_pages;
> nodemask_t nodes;
> @@ -2676,25 +2698,12 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
> me->il_weight = 0;
> prev_node = node;
>
> - /* create a local copy of node weights to operate on outside rcu */
> - weights = kzalloc(nr_node_ids, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!weights)
> - return total_allocated;
> -
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - state = rcu_dereference(wi_state);
> - if (state) {
> - memcpy(weights, state->iw_table, nr_node_ids * sizeof(u8));
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - } else {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++)
> - weights[i] = 1;
> - }
> + state = wi_state_get();
> + table = state ? state->iw_table : NULL;
>
> /* calculate total, detect system default usage */
> for_each_node_mask(node, nodes)
> - weight_total += weights[node];
> + weight_total += table ? table[node] : 1;
>
> /*
> * Calculate rounds/partial rounds to minimize __alloc_pages_bulk calls.
> @@ -2706,10 +2715,10 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
> rounds = rem_pages / weight_total;
> delta = rem_pages % weight_total;
> resume_node = next_node_in(prev_node, nodes);
> - resume_weight = weights[resume_node];
> + resume_weight = table ? table[resume_node] : 1;
> for (i = 0; i < nnodes; i++) {
> node = next_node_in(prev_node, nodes);
> - weight = weights[node];
> + weight = table ? table[node] : 1;
> node_pages = weight * rounds;
> /* If a delta exists, add this node's portion of the delta */
> if (delta > weight) {
> @@ -2735,7 +2744,7 @@ static unsigned long alloc_pages_bulk_weighted_interleave(gfp_t gfp,
> }
> me->il_prev = resume_node;
> me->il_weight = resume_weight;
> - kfree(weights);
> + wi_state_put(state);
> return total_allocated;
> }
>

Bit of a shame to take/put a refcount on every memory allocation. That
seems like it might hurt (even being on a different cacheline). Would
it make more sense to use SRCU for this?