Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Defer the GMID_EL1 read to {init,update}_cpu_features()

[Will Deacon]

On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 04:14:41PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 at 14:09, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * info->reg_gmid deferred to {init,update}_cpu_features because
> > > +      * reading it traps to EL2 when MTE is disabled.
> > > +      */
> >
> > I don't think we should defer this, as I've been actively doing the
> > opposite for parallel CPU onlining (where the ID registers can be read
> > concurrently by incoming CPUs to amortise the cost of a trap) and also
> > for the RNG traps during early boot:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/annJ0oDB2HObQC5j@willie-the-truck/
> >
> > If you look at the diff I sent in the thread above (I didn't get a
> > reply), the idea is that __read_sysreg_by_encoding() reads from the ID
> > register values stashed by cpuinfo_store_cpu(). So you could use that
> > to check id_aa64pfr1 before reading gmid, as it will give you the
> > sanitised view.
> 
> I just did, but I don't think it'll work. The thing is,
> __read_sysreg_by_encoding() gives the override-applied local value,
> not the folded sys_val.
> 
> arm64.nomte is a command-line override, so that works. But
> CONFIG_ARM64_MTE=n sets none. Any gate would still need an explicit
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE).
> 
> That said, I don't have to defer it. I can keep the info->reg_gmid
> read in __cpuinfo_store_cpu() and gate that read on the state that
> arms the trap:
> 
>         static inline bool gmid_el1_accessible(u64 pfr1)
>         {
>                 if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE))
>                         return false;
>                 if (system_capabilities_finalized())
>                         return system_supports_mte();
>                 return id_aa64pfr1_mte(pfr1);
>         }
> 
> 
> TID5 is set from system_supports_mte() and only once capabilities are
> finalised, so the local check is still correct before that. Gating on
> system_supports_mte() keeps the different-physical-CPU case you want
> to preserve working: if one re-onlines with MTE while the system view
> has it folded off, the gate stays false and it won't read GMID_EL1.

I still don't understand why you have system_supports_mte() here. If
the CPU has MTE, the CONFIG option is enabled and the cmdline override
isn't set, we can read GMID just fine on this CPU, regardless of the
system capabilities.

> If you agree, I'll respin with that.

I can't tell who's calling gmid_el1_accessible() so it's hard to tell
whether I agree or not. May as well send a v3 though, so we can see what
you have in mind!

Will