Re: [PATCH v6 9/9] iio: accel: mma8452: Use proper error code when missing device model

From: Joshua Crofts

Date: Tue Aug 25 2026 - 06:23:14 EST


On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:27:47 +0200
Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The device is there, but we don't have data describing how to use it.

A bit of a weird commit message IMO, I'd do

Switch -ENODEV error on i2c_get_match_data() failure to -ENODATA to
satisfy the IIO coding style. (but this is only my opinion).

(We recently had a few conversations about -ENODEV vs. -ENODATA and
while there are a lot of uses of -ENODEV in IIO they should be replaced
with -ENODATA when checking *_get_match_data() results).

>
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> index 4a1eb196589a..42e3371cdb1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> @@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> data->chip_info = i2c_get_match_data(client);
> if (!data->chip_info)
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "unknown device model\n");
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODATA, "unknown device model\n");
>
> ret = iio_read_mount_matrix(dev, &data->orientation);
> if (ret)
>

Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@xxxxxxxxx>

--
Kind regards,
Joshua Crofts