Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)

[Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 8:48 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 03:27:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, August 24, 2026 9:15:16 PM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since 20260820:
> > > >
> > > > None.
> > > >
> > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073
> > > >  5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > on x86_64 allmodconfig:
> > >
> > > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> > > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it.
> >
> > Does the appended patch address it?
> >
> > Interestingly enough, it doesn't complain for me when I build the
> > thermal tree merged on top of the current mainline.
>
> FWIW, I sent a fix for this two weeks ago that explains the semantic
> conflict:
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/20260812-qcom-spmi-mbg-tm-ns-modpost-error-v1-1-d849390d2714@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> You will only see it when the IIO tree is merged against the thermal
> tree.

I missed that one, thanks for the pointer!