Re: [PATCH v2] ocfs2: fix deadlock in inline-data truncate transactions
From: Joseph Qi
Date: Wed Aug 26 2026 - 04:01:06 EST
On 8/6/26 11:59 AM, ZhengYuan Huang wrote:
> [BUG]
> Updating an inode xattr can cause an ABBA deadlock with
> inline file truncation.
>
> ocfs2_truncate_file()
> down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem)
> ocfs2_truncate_inline()
> ocfs2_start_trans()
>
> ocfs2_xattr_set()
> ocfs2_start_trans()
> ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set()
> down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem)
>
> [CAUSE]
> The xattr set path starts its merged transaction before the helpers which
> modify inode-body xattrs acquire ip_alloc_sem. This creates the reverse of
> the ip_alloc_sem -> transaction order used by the allocation and truncate
> paths. The transaction merge in
> commit 85db90e77806 ("ocfs2/xattr: Merge xattr set transaction.")
> introduced this ordering for ordinary xattr updates.
>
> The create-time transaction -> ip_xattr_sem dependency is a separate case.
> The fix in
> commit c13024342c82 ("ocfs2: fix circular locking dependency in ocfs2_init_acl()")
> prepares the parent ACL before the create transaction and avoids the xattr
> semaphore for initial xattrs on an unpublished inode. That change does not
> cover ordinary ocfs2_xattr_set().
>
> [FIX]
> Acquire ip_alloc_sem in ocfs2_xattr_set() before xattr preparation,
> allocation reservations, and transaction start. Tell the inode-body and
> indexed-block helpers when the semaphore is already held, while preserving
> their local locking for callers that do not provide outer protection.
>
> Keep the existing ip_alloc_sem -> transaction order in allocation and
> truncate paths; fixing the xattr side avoids changing that established
> ordering.
>
I'd rather fix it in an alternative way by pushing the semaphore fully
up into ocfs2_xattr_set() and strip it from the helpers entirely, which
seems more cleaner.
I have a local prototype and will send out when pass regression tests.
Thanks,
Joseph
> Fixes: 85db90e77806 ("ocfs2/xattr: Merge xattr set transaction.")
> Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> - Fix the xattr side of the lock ordering based on Joseph's feedback.
> - Explain why the remaining fix belongs on the ordinary xattr side.
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> index 35bcbb0ff607..27bea1f360a1 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt {
> struct ocfs2_alloc_context *data_ac;
> struct ocfs2_cached_dealloc_ctxt dealloc;
> int set_abort;
> + int alloc_sem_protected;
> };
>
> #define OCFS2_XATTR_ROOT_SIZE (sizeof(struct ocfs2_xattr_def_value_root))
> @@ -2916,7 +2917,8 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_has_space_inline(struct inode *inode,
> static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(struct inode *inode,
> int name_index,
> const char *name,
> - struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs)
> + struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs,
> + int lock_alloc_sem)
> {
> struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
> struct ocfs2_dinode *di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)xs->inode_bh->b_data;
> @@ -2927,9 +2929,11 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(struct inode *inode,
> return 0;
>
> if (!(oi->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_XATTR_FL)) {
> - down_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + if (lock_alloc_sem)
> + down_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> has_space = ocfs2_xattr_has_space_inline(inode, di);
> - up_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + if (lock_alloc_sem)
> + up_read(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> if (!has_space)
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -3016,14 +3020,17 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set(struct inode *inode,
> struct ocfs2_xattr_search *xs,
> struct ocfs2_xattr_set_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret, took_alloc_sem = 0;
> struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
> struct ocfs2_xa_loc loc;
>
> if (inode->i_sb->s_blocksize == OCFS2_MIN_BLOCKSIZE)
> return -ENOSPC;
>
> - down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + if (!ctxt->alloc_sem_protected) {
> + down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + took_alloc_sem = 1;
> + }
> if (!(oi->ip_dyn_features & OCFS2_INLINE_XATTR_FL)) {
> ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_init(inode, xs->inode_bh, ctxt);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -3044,7 +3051,8 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_ibody_set(struct inode *inode,
> xs->here = loc.xl_entry;
>
> out:
> - up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + if (took_alloc_sem)
> + up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -3729,6 +3737,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle,
> .handle = handle,
> .meta_ac = meta_ac,
> .data_ac = data_ac,
> + .alloc_sem_protected = 1,
> };
>
> if (!ocfs2_supports_xattr(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb)))
> @@ -3750,7 +3759,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set_handle(handle_t *handle,
> xis.inode_bh = xbs.inode_bh = di_bh;
> di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data;
>
> - ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis);
> + ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis, 0);
> if (ret)
> goto cleanup;
> if (xis.not_found) {
> @@ -3834,7 +3843,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
> * Scan inode and external block to find the same name
> * extended attribute and collect search information.
> */
> - ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis);
> + ret = ocfs2_xattr_ibody_find(inode, name_index, name, &xis, 1);
> if (ret)
> goto cleanup;
> if (xis.not_found) {
> @@ -3856,6 +3865,8 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
> goto cleanup;
> }
>
> + down_write(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem);
> +
> /* Check whether the value is refcounted and do some preparation. */
> if (ocfs2_is_refcount_inode(inode) &&
> (!xis.not_found || !xbs.not_found)) {
> @@ -3864,7 +3875,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
> &ref_meta, &ref_credits);
> if (ret) {
> mlog_errno(ret);
> - goto cleanup;
> + goto out_unlock_alloc;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -3875,7 +3886,7 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
> if (ret < 0) {
> inode_unlock(tl_inode);
> mlog_errno(ret);
> - goto cleanup;
> + goto out_unlock_alloc;
> }
> }
> inode_unlock(tl_inode);
> @@ -3884,8 +3895,9 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
> &xbs, &ctxt, ref_meta, &credits);
> if (ret) {
> mlog_errno(ret);
> - goto cleanup;
> + goto out_unlock_alloc;
> }
> + ctxt.alloc_sem_protected = 1;
>
> /* we need to update inode's ctime field, so add credit for it. */
> credits += OCFS2_INODE_UPDATE_CREDITS;
> @@ -3893,15 +3905,15 @@ int ocfs2_xattr_set(struct inode *inode,
> if (IS_ERR(ctxt.handle)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(ctxt.handle);
> mlog_errno(ret);
> - goto out_free_ac;
> + goto out_unlock_alloc;
> }
>
> ret = __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle(inode, di, &xi, &xis, &xbs, &ctxt);
> ocfs2_update_inode_fsync_trans(ctxt.handle, inode, 0);
>
> ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, ctxt.handle);
> -
> -out_free_ac:
> +out_unlock_alloc:
> + up_write(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem);
> if (ctxt.data_ac)
> ocfs2_free_alloc_context(ctxt.data_ac);
> if (ctxt.meta_ac)
> @@ -4520,6 +4532,7 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_create_index_block(struct inode *inode,
> u64 blkno;
> handle_t *handle = ctxt->handle;
> struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi = OCFS2_I(inode);
> + int took_alloc_sem = 0;
> struct buffer_head *xb_bh = xs->xattr_bh;
> struct ocfs2_xattr_block *xb =
> (struct ocfs2_xattr_block *)xb_bh->b_data;
> @@ -4537,7 +4550,10 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_create_index_block(struct inode *inode,
> * We can use this lock for now, and maybe move to a dedicated mutex
> * if performance becomes a problem later.
> */
> - down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + if (!ctxt->alloc_sem_protected) {
> + down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + took_alloc_sem = 1;
> + }
>
> ret = ocfs2_journal_access_xb(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), xb_bh,
> OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
> @@ -4600,7 +4616,8 @@ static int ocfs2_xattr_create_index_block(struct inode *inode,
> ocfs2_journal_dirty(handle, xb_bh);
>
> out:
> - up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> + if (took_alloc_sem)
> + up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
>
> return ret;
> }