Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-h264: Fix memcmp() size in B1 reference list comparison
From: Nicolas Dufresne
Date: Fri Aug 28 2026 - 14:43:28 EST
Le vendredi 28 août 2026 à 10:17 +0800, Haotian Zhang a écrit :
> In v4l2_h264_build_b_ref_lists(), the B0/B1 list equality
> check passes the entry count builder->num_valid to memcmp()
> instead of a byte size. Since struct v4l2_h264_reference is
> two bytes (fields and index), only half of each list is
> compared, so distinct lists can be wrongly treated as equal
> and trigger an incorrect swap(b1_reflist[0], b1_reflist[1]).
>
> Change the memcmp() size argument to builder->num_valid *
> sizeof(*b1_reflist) so that the full byte length of both
> reference lists is compared.
>
> Fixes: 624922a2739b ("media: v4l2-core: Add helpers to build the H264 P/B0/B1 reflists")
> Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
> index c00197d095e7..1b1421caf488 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
> @@ -440,7 +440,8 @@ v4l2_h264_build_b_ref_lists(const struct v4l2_h264_reflist_builder *builder,
> }
>
> if (builder->num_valid > 1 &&
> - !memcmp(b1_reflist, b0_reflist, builder->num_valid))
> + !memcmp(b1_reflist, b0_reflist,
> + builder->num_valid * sizeof(*b1_reflist)))
One last comment, I think this would be more consistent with the memcpy() calls:
+ sizeof(b1_reflist[0]) * builder->num_valid))
Nicolas
> swap(b1_reflist[0], b1_reflist[1]);
>
> print_ref_list_b(builder, b0_reflist, 0);
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part