Re: [PATCH 0/2] squashfs: harden fragment index table sizing

[Phillip Lougher]

> On 29/08/2026 00:37 BST Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  
> Sashiko review of this series claims to have found a whole bunch of
> similar issues which you may choose to address:
> 
> 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260822143328.68867-1-kmehltretter@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> I don't know how useful this report will be - the first part seems
> wrong in lots of ways, as if Sashiko was using an ancient copy of the
> code.  But the things it claims aren't there have been present since
> 2018.
> 

I have been receiving a lot of AI generated issues similar to these on the
Squashfs-tools code and the Squashfs kernel code over the last month.

I have not been idle and ignoring them, and I have been spent the last
couple of weeks fixing them full-time in the Squashfs-tools code, and
the kernel code.

In the Squashfs-tools code I have reviewed about 20,000 lines of code so
far, and this has generated over 50 commits.  These commits I have
committed to the Squashfs-tools git-hub repository here

https://github.com/plougher/squashfs-tools

I am also most of the way through reviewing the Squashfs kernel code, it
is about 70% complete.  So far it has generated 12 patches, and there
will be more.  Obviously the kernel patches are queued up for a posting
next week.

So I am not asleep at the wheel here, I know about them and I am
addressing them.

Phillip