Re: [PATCH printk v2 0/2] nbcon irq_work fixes
From: Petr Mladek
Date: Mon Aug 31 2026 - 04:54:10 EST
On Mon 2026-08-31 10:22:37, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2026-08-31 08:31:22 [+0100], Bradley Morgan wrote:
> > On 31 August 2026 07:36:48 BST, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> > <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >On 2026-08-29 00:39:15 [+0100], Bradley Morgan wrote:
> > >> Tested-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # PKVM, based on Pixel
> > >7 (ARM64)
> > >
> > >Does this PKVM even use a nbcon and if so which one?
> > >
> >
> > heh, not PKVM itself, I booted a kernel inside PKVM, which is the
> > hypervisor, the kernel has nbcon inside. My T-B is for the kernel
>
> That tested-by is futile if none of the suggested changes were actually
> tested.
Yeah, I am going to omit this tested-by tag if I remember to remove
it from the patch generated by b4.
Best Regards,
Petr
PS: Bradley, this is not a good way to become part of the kernel
community. The tested-by flag would be valuable only when
the modified code was used during the test.