Re: [PATCH 2/4] ocfs2: validate suballoc bit during inode read
From: Heming Zhao
Date: Mon Aug 31 2026 - 12:23:08 EST
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 02:28:46PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> i_suballoc_bit of a dinode is currently not validated at all. A
> corrupted dinode can carry an abnormally large i_suballoc_bit, which
> bypasses ocfs2_validate_inode_block(). When the inode is deleted,
> ocfs2_remove_inode() calls ocfs2_free_dinode(), which passes the
> unvalidated bit to _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits() and triggers
> BUG_ON((count + start_bit) > ocfs2_bits_per_group(cl)).
>
> Since suballocator block group bitmaps are contained in a single
> block, a valid suballoc bit must be smaller than the number of bits
> per block. Reject oversized i_suballoc_bit values during dinode
> validation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index eda50f13ffb5..a982c99a9678 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1543,6 +1543,20 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> goto bail;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * A suballocator block group bitmap is contained in a single block,
> + * so a valid suballoc bit can never exceed the number of bits per
> + * block. Otherwise deleting the inode will pass the oversized bit
> + * to _ocfs2_free_suballoc_bits() via ocfs2_free_dinode() and trigger
> + * BUG_ON((count + start_bit) > ocfs2_bits_per_group(cl)).
> + */
> + if (le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_bit) >= sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
> + rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode %llu: suballoc bit %u\n",
> + (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
> + le16_to_cpu(di->i_suballoc_bit));
> + goto bail;
> + }
> +
> if ((le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_ORPHANED_FL) &&
> le16_to_cpu(di->i_orphaned_slot) >= OCFS2_SB(sb)->max_slots) {
> rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode %llu: orphaned slot %u\n",
> --
> 2.39.3
>