Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] x86/sev: Make SVSM calls preemption-safe
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Mon Aug 31 2026 - 21:44:45 EST
+ folks who added the vtpm stuff.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 03:39:39AM +0000, Melody Wang wrote:
> Two functions in the the SVSM vTPM guest implementation do not disable
> preemption when fetching CAA.
" ... when fetching the SVSM Calling Area Address (CAA).
The SVSM CAA..."
This way, you introduce what CAA means and then use the abbreviation.
> The SVSM calling area is a per-CPU structure. When a thread is preempted
> and migrated to a different CPU after fetching the per-CPU Calling Area
> Address (CAA), the SVSM call will execute on the new CPU with the
and here you can use "CAA" directly because you've explained it above.
> original CPU's CAA. Which is wrong.
>
> Move the CAA fetching operation inside svsm_perform_call_protocol()
> which disables interrupts around the SVSM call and thus runs
> preemption-safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Melody Wang <huibo.wang@xxxxxxx>
Should this be CC:stable so that it gets backported?
I think we want to do that and mark it with
Fixes: 770de678bc28 ("x86/sev: Add SVSM vTPM probe/send_command functions")
> ---
> arch/x86/coco/sev/svsm.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/sev/svsm.c b/arch/x86/coco/sev/svsm.c
> index 916d62cd17dc..92ea93f506c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/sev/svsm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/sev/svsm.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,15 @@ int svsm_perform_call_protocol(struct svsm_call *call)
>
> flags = native_local_irq_save();
>
> + /*
> + * 'caa' is a per-CPU variable. To avoid using a stale or incorrect
> + * 'caa' if the task is preempted or migrates to another CPU after it
"... or migrated to another CPU after the CAA has been fetched..."
> + * is fetched, always fetch 'caa' and then issue the SVSM call with
> + * interrupts disabled. This ensures the correct 'caa' is used even
> + * under preemption or CPU migration.
s/even under preemption or CPU migration//
That's kinda clear.
Leaving in the rest for the newly CCed.
> + */
> + call->caa = svsm_get_caa();
> +
> ghcb = __sev_get_ghcb(&state);
>
> do {
> @@ -321,7 +330,6 @@ int snp_svsm_vtpm_send_command(u8 *buffer)
> {
> struct svsm_call call = {};
>
> - call.caa = svsm_get_caa();
> call.rax = SVSM_VTPM_CALL(SVSM_VTPM_CMD);
> call.rcx = __pa(buffer);
>
> @@ -345,7 +353,6 @@ bool snp_svsm_vtpm_probe(void)
> if (!snp_vmpl)
> return false;
>
> - call.caa = svsm_get_caa();
> call.rax = SVSM_VTPM_CALL(SVSM_VTPM_QUERY);
>
> if (svsm_perform_call_protocol(&call))
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette