Re: [PATCH v3 05/17] LoongArch: kexec: Fix CMA page leaks in segment placement retry loops

[Jinjie Ruan]

在 2026/8/31 22:09, Huacai Chen 写道:
> Hi, Jinjie,
> 
> Why does the ARM64 version of this patch use "kexec_file" in the
> subject line but the LoongArch version uses "kexec"? It is better to
> keep consistency.

Hi Huacai,

Thank you for the review. I will revise the subject in v4.

Best regards,
Jinjie

> 
> Huacai
> 
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 5:25 PM Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> During kexec image placement retry loops, any midway failure causes
>> the loader to truncate `image->nr_segments` back to its initial state
>> to purge the failed segments.
>>
>> However, this truncation introduces a memory leak. The CMA pages
>> allocated via kexec_add_buffer() during the failed attempt are tracked
>> in the `image->segment_cma` array. Because the subsequent cleanup paths
>> only iterate up to the truncated `nr_segments` boundary, these allocated
>> CMA pages outside the new boundary are permanently leaked.
>>
>> Fix this by explicitly releasing the associated CMA buffers in
>> the failure paths before `image->nr_segments` is reduced.
>>
>> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729031235.2840255-1-ruanjinjie%40huawei.com
>> Fixes: 55d990f0084c ("LoongArch: Add EFI binary support for kexec_file")
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c          | 1 +
>>  arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 6 +++++-
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
>> index 5ee78ebb1546..15fd797ff3de 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/kexec_efi.c
>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static void *efi_kexec_load(struct kimage *image,
>>                  * We couldn't find space for the other segments; erase the
>>                  * kernel segment and try the next available hole.
>>                  */
>> +               kexec_free_segment_cma(image, kernel_segment_number);
>>                 image->nr_segments -= 1;
>>                 kbuf.buf_min = kernel_segment->mem + kernel_segment->memsz;
>>                 kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>> index 5412aa9f3568..62a5be102065 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
>> @@ -217,7 +217,11 @@ int load_other_segments(struct kimage *image,
>>         return 0;
>>
>>  out_err:
>> -       image->nr_segments = orig_segments;
>> +       while (image->nr_segments > orig_segments) {
>> +               kexec_free_segment_cma(image, image->nr_segments - 1);
>> +               image->nr_segments--;
>> +       }
>> +
>>         kfree(modified_cmdline);
>>         return ret;
>>  }
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>