Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: vmscan: fix scan overshoot and ineligible folio scanning

[mawupeng]

On 周日 2026-8-30 11:18, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:59:54 +0800 mawupeng <mawupeng1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hi, maintainers
>>   Kindly ping.
> 
> It's been quite a while.  It would be helpful to refresh/retest/resend,
> please.

Thanks, Andrew. I’ll retest it with the background (situation, end-user impact,
reproduction, A/B) folded into the cover letter and re-tested on the current -rc.

> 
> While doing this, please update the changelogging to help reviewers
> understand the end-user impact of the issue.
> 
> Please also give some though to whether we should backport these fixes
> into earlier kernels, with a cc:stable.  Given the unusual
> circumstances which are required to hit this, I'm thinking "no", but
> feel free to disagree!

On cc:stable — I agree it doesn’t seem warranted. The conditions needed
to trigger this are unusual enough that I don’t think a backport is
justified, so I’d lean toward not adding Cc:stable. Happy to revisit if
I’m missing something.

>