Re: [PATCH v9 00/12] Add initial support for Qualcomm SM7250 SoC
From: Sreeshankar K
Date: Tue Sep 01 2026 - 12:52:58 EST
On Tue, 1 Sept 2026 at 19:51, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 26-09-01 18:22:34, Sreeshankar K wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Sept 2026 at 17:32, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 26-09-01 09:24:35, Sreeshankar K wrote:
> > > > This patchset introduces foundational upstream support for the Qualcomm SM7250
> > > > SoC (internally codenamed Lito).
> > > >
> > > > SM7250 is an ARMv8.2-A platform manufactured on a 7nm process, featuring an
> > > > octa-core Kryo 475 CPU configuration (1x Prime Cortex-A76, 1x Gold Cortex-A76,
> > > > and 6x Silver Cortex-A55) and Adreno 620 GPU.
> > > >
> > > > This patchset is organized as follows:
> > > > > Document relevant device tree bindings (SoC ID, Kryo 475 CPUs, SCM, PDC,
> > > > RPMh clocks/power domains, GCC and cpufreq hardware).
> > > > > Add driver support for SM7250 in socinfo, rpmh-clk, rpmhpd, and GCC.
> > > > > Add the base SoC DTSI (sm7250.dtsi) defining the cpus, PSCI,
> > > > interrupt controllers, clock providers, power domains, and reserved memory.
> > > >
> > > > Dependencies:
> > > > This patchset depends on the following patch:
> > > > > [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,sm6375-gcc: Merge SM7150 into SM6375
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20260817082457.64797-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> > > >
> > > > Changelog [v9]:
> > > > > [PATCH v9 04/13]: clk: qcom: Add Global Clock Controller (GCC) driver for SM7250
> > > > Make all clk_init_data instances const across the driver.
> > >
> > > You sent 3 versions in less than 24 hours. Please slow down.
> > >
> > > Give a chance to the reviewers to have a look at each version before
> > > sending a new one.
> >
> >
> > I apologize for my actions. v7 was the intended new patchset. Unfortunately
> > there was an interruption during submission of patches, only 08/12
> > patches submitted.
> > That's why I submitted the v8 patchset.
>
> Yes, and now you have sent v9. So even without the v7, you still have 2
> version in just a couple of hours.
I will keep that in mind while submitting future patchset.
Thanks,
Sreeshankar K