Re: [BUG] bpf: x86 timed may_goto corrupts private-stack JIT state
From: Siddharth Chintamaneni
Date: Tue Sep 01 2026 - 15:05:56 EST
On Tue, 1 Sept 2026 at 00:11, Jérémy Jean <jeremy.jean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2026-09-01 00:57, Siddharth Chintamaneni wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 at 18:10, Alexei Starovoitov
> > <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon Aug 24, 2026 at 2:31 PM PDT, Jérémy Jean wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > With the help of AI models, I found a bug in the x86 timed may_goto path that
> >> > leads to a verifier/JIT state mismatch on private-stack programs.
> >> >
> >> > The root cause is that timed may_goto fixups pass a stack offset in BPF_REG_AX
> >> > and the x86 trampoline reconstructs the counter pointer from native %rbp. That
> >> > is incorrect once private-stack JIT mode is enabled: ordinary BPF frame pointer
> >> > accesses are remapped from %rbp to %r9, but arch_bpf_timed_may_goto() still
> >> > uses %rbp and ends up reading and writing the native JIT frame instead of the
> >> > private BPF stack.
> >> >
> >> > The bug was introduced by 2fb761823ead ("bpf, x86: Add x86 JIT support for timed
> >> > may_goto"). I reproduced it on a KASAN-enabled x86_64 kernel based on v7.2,
> >> > however KASAN does not trigger because the bad write stays inside the native
> >> > JIT frame. Yet, the saved-register corruption is observable.
> >> >
> >> > I have not included a patch here because the fix seems subtle to me and would
> >> > likely touch many files for different arch.
> >> >
> >> > I can share the minimal reproducer and other details privately with maintainers
> >> > if useful.
> >>
> >> Just send a fix and a selftest to the list.
> >>
> >
> > Jeremy,
> >
> > I just wanted to check whether you're working on a patch for this. if
> > not, I'd be happy to take a look.
>
> Hello,
>
> No, not at the moment.
> Feel free to ask if I can be of some help
>
Let me playaorund with it. I'll let you know if I have more questions. Thanks!
> Regards,
> Jérémy