Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched_ext: document the rolling-cursor requirement for dsq_vtime
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Tue Sep 01 2026 - 16:00:07 EST
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 10:03:42PM +0800, Tao Cui wrote:
...
> + * should stay within half the u64 range (2^63) of each other so that
> + * time_before64() ordering remains well-defined.
Two values exactly 2^63 apart are before each other in both directions, so
"less than 2^63 apart". Also, please fold this into the paragraph above.
Thanks.
--
tejun