Re: [PATCH v3] mm/damon/ops-common: use a page-aligned address in damon_ptep_mkold()

From: SJ Park

Date: Tue Sep 01 2026 - 20:12:28 EST


On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 13:10:01 -0700 Nathan Gao <zcgao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> __damon_va_prepare_access_check() picks a random byte address within the
> region and stores it in r->sampling_addr. damon_va_mkold() passes it into
> a page table walk, which hands it to damon_ptep_mkold() as the address of
> the page to sample:
>
> damon_va_mkold(mm, r->sampling_addr)
> damon_va_walk_page_range(mm, addr, addr + 1)
> damon_mkold_pmd_entry()
> damon_ptep_mkold(pte, vma, addr)
> ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr, pte)
> mmu_notifier_clear_young(mm, addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE)
>
> For arm64, before commit 6f0e1142173a ("arm64: mm: support batch
> clearing of the young flag for large folios"), the contpte helper walked
> exactly CONT_PTES entries from the aligned-down page table pointer and
> used @addr only to pass down to each entry, so an unaligned value was
> harmless:
>
> ptep = contpte_align_down(ptep);
> addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PTE_SIZE);
> for (i = 0; i < CONT_PTES; i++, ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE)
>
> Now the range to walk is derived from @addr instead: end = addr +
> nr * PAGE_SIZE, rounded up to CONT_PTE_SIZE. For a sample in the last
> page of a contpte block, the sub-page offset puts end just past the
> block boundary, so the round-up lands a whole block further and the
> walk clears PTE_AF in CONT_PTES entries beyond the sampled block. For
> the last block in a page table page, those entries are past the end of
> that page, so the walk writes into the page that follows.

I just wanted to call out again that I'm wondering if we could restore the
unaligned address support in the helper. E.g., as a very dirty hack that I can
imagine off the top of my head,

'''
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/contpte.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static inline pte_t *contpte_align_addr_ptep(unsigned long *start,
unsigned long *end, pte_t *ptep,
unsigned int nr)
{
+ *start = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(*start);
/*
* Note: caller must ensure these nr PTEs are consecutive (present)
* PTEs that map consecutive pages of the same large folio within a
'''

I and Nathan have no strong clue, so we are looking for Baolin and others'
opinion.

While waiting for the opinions, I and Nathan agree we should stop bleeding with
a pinpoint hotfix change in DAMON.

>
> Triggered by the full 7.1/7.2 kernel selftest suite on arm64 (EC2
> c/m6g.4xlarge). The kernel sometimes crashes at or shortly after the
> DAMON test.
>
> What the overrun does depends on the page that happens to follow the
> page table, so there is no single signature. If that page is read-only,
> the write faults in the sampling path itself:
>
> Unable to handle kernel write to read-only memory at virtual address ffff0003c5d2d000
> FSC = 0x0f: level 3 permission fault
> CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 3487 Comm: kdamond.2
> pc : contpte_test_and_clear_young_ptes+0x70/0xc0
> lr : damon_ptep_mkold+0x1e8/0x1f8
> Call trace:
> contpte_test_and_clear_young_ptes+0x70/0xc0 (P)
> damon_mkold_pmd_entry+0x150/0x170
> walk_pmd_range+0x110/0x2b0
> walk_pud_range+0x10c/0x208
> walk_pgd_range+0x134/0x258
> __walk_page_range+0x98/0x1b0
> walk_page_range_vma_unsafe+0x90/0x148
> walk_page_range_vma+0x28/0x40
> damon_va_walk_page_range+0x114/0x2b8
> damon_va_prepare_access_checks+0xec/0x1a8
> kdamond_fn+0x534/0x770
> kthread+0x128/0x138
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
> Otherwise the page is writable, the PTE_AF clearing succeeds silently
> and the damage only surfaces later, in whatever happened to own the
> page, so the backtrace is unrelated to DAMON and differs between runs.
>
> Align the address down to a page boundary in damon_ptep_mkold(). Its
> ptep_test_and_clear_young() call is the only place DAMON can reach
> contpte_test_and_clear_young_ptes() from. r->sampling_addr itself is left
> as is, so the sampling and region bookkeeping semantics are unchanged.
>
> Fixes: 6f0e1142173a ("arm64: mm: support batch clearing of the young flag for large folios")
> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Gao <zcgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V2 -> V3:
> - Move the alignment into damon_ptep_mkold(), instead of aligning in
> damon_va_mkold() and damon_va_young(). The ptep_test_and_clear_young()
> call in damon_ptep_mkold() is DAMON's only path to
> contpte_test_and_clear_young_ptes(), so damon_ptep_mkold() is the
> closest place in DAMON to the function that requires an aligned
> address (SJ)

Thank you for doing this revision for my humble request!

>
> V1 -> V2:
> - Align inside damon_va_mkold() and damon_va_young() rather than aligning
> r->sampling_addr itself, so that sub-page sampling addresses remain
> possible for future non-PTE access check primitives (SJ)
> - Point Fixes: at 6f0e1142173a instead of 3f49584b262c, since the
> unaligned address was harmless before that commit (SJ)
> - Describe how the issue was noticed and what it does to the kernel (SJ)
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260831221151.50561-1-zcgao@xxxxxxxxxx/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260827193821.46115-1-zcgao@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> mm/damon/ops-common.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/ops-common.c b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> index 0bcad6b1e5b9e..cd8aa08233e54 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ void damon_ptep_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr
> bool young = false;
> unsigned long pfn;
>
> + /*
> + * Arch implementation of ptep_test_and_clear_young() may require
> + * aligned @addr
> + */
> + addr = PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(addr);
> +
> if (likely(pte_present(pteval)))
> pfn = pte_pfn(pteval);
> else

I agree this should fix the issue.

Maybe I'm being too picky, but... 'addr' is also being used in later
mmu_notifier_clear_young() call. Could we further scope down to do the
alignment only for the function that disallows unaligned address? For example,

'''
--- a/mm/damon/ops-common.c
+++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.c
@@ -61,7 +61,12 @@ void damon_ptep_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr
* device aspects.
*/
if (likely(pte_present(pteval)))
- young |= ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, addr, pte);
+ /*
+ * Arch implementation of ptep_test_and_clear_young() may
+ * require aligned @addr
+ */
+ young |= ptep_test_and_clear_young(vma, PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN(addr),
+ pte);
young |= mmu_notifier_clear_young(vma->vm_mm, addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
if (young)
folio_set_young(folio);
'''


> --
> 2.50.1


Thanks,
SJ