Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/mglru: make retry logic explicit in isolate_folios()

From: Baoquan He

Date: Wed Sep 02 2026 - 04:13:29 EST


Hi Barry,

On 08/29/26 at 03:42pm, Barry Song (Xiaomi) wrote:
> The existing mainline code retries the same type once in a rather
> subtle way. `for_each_evictable_type()` may provide one more iteration,
> allowing the same type to be retried if we scanned some folios but
> failed to isolate any due to protections, promotions, or races. This
> patch makes the retry behavior explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 35a233623368..718f59ffc688 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -4852,6 +4852,7 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> bool type_fallback_allowed = !is_single_type_reclaim(swappiness);
> int type = get_type_to_scan(lruvec, swappiness);
> int total_scanned = 0, scanned, tier;
> + bool tried = false;
>
> retry:
> tier = get_tier_idx(lruvec, type);
> @@ -4871,9 +4872,18 @@ static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> */
> if (!scanned && type_fallback_allowed) {
> type = !type;
> + tried = true;
> type_fallback_allowed = false;
> goto retry;
> }
> + /*
> + * We scanned some folios but failed to isolate any due to promotions,
> + * protections, or races. Retry once to avoid a larger loop.
> + */
> + if (scanned && !tried) {
> + tried = true;
> + goto retry;

Seems patch 1 and 2 makes not minor difference than mainline kernel on
behaviour.

1, if swappiness is 0 because no swap, it will run two times if
(scanned != 0). This is not corner case, but usually seen on some
systems w/o swap device. The 2nd no gain run could decrease efficiency.

static int get_swappiness(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
...

if (!sc->may_swap)
return 0;
...
}

2, for swappiness (0, 200), the behavious is minor changed.

Mark one scan_folios() result as one of:
iso *isolated > 0
empty scanned == 0 && !*isolated
busy scanned > 0 && !*isolated

mainline: T(busy) -> T(empty) -> return (2 scans, no fallback)
v2: T(busy) -> T(empty) -> !T(...) (a 3rd scan_folios())

Maybe we can go like below:

static int isolate_folios(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct lruvec *lruvec,
struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness,
struct list_head *list, int *isolated,
int *isolate_type, int *isolate_scanned)
...

for (attempt = 0; attempt < 2; attempt++) {
int scanned = scan_folios(nr_to_scan, lruvec, sc, type,
get_tier_idx(lruvec, type), list, isolated);

total_scanned += scanned;
if (*isolated) {
*isolate_type = type;
*isolate_scanned = scanned;
return total_scanned;
}
if (attempt) /* already retried / fell back once */
break;
if (scanned)
continue; /* retry the same type once */
if (single_type)
break; /* no fallback for 0 / anon-only */
type = !type; /* empty: fall back to the other type */
}

return total_scanned;
}

This preserves mainline for 1..200 exactly, keeps the intended 0/201
same-type retry, and cannot produce a third scan. Just personal opinion.

> + }
>
> return total_scanned;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>