[PATCH v2] mm/damon/core: fix false positive in
From: Liew Rui Yan
Date: Wed Sep 02 2026 - 05:18:15 EST
On Wed, 02 Sep 2026 16:18:25 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When setting goal_tuner to 'temporal', if the goal is achieved,
> quota->esz_bp will be set to zero. In this case, damos_quota_is_full()
> will always return true, even if no regions have been tried to apply at
> all. This causes qt_exceeds to increase unexpectedly.
>
> Fix it by:
>
> - Returning false in damos_quota_is_full() when quota->charged_sz is
> zero.
> - Adding an early exit in damon_do_apply_schemes() for schemes with zero
> esz.
>
> Fixes: c7ec7d5f6b3d ("mm/damon/core: handle <min_region_sz remaining quota as empty")
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v7.2.x
> Signed-off-by: Liew Rui Yan <aethernet65535@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes from v1:
> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20260901105925.106186-1-aethernet65535@xxxxxxxxx
> - Changed the check in damos_quota_is_full() from '!quota->esz' to
> '!quota->charged_sz', because the former is an upper bound, while the
> latter represents the actual quota usage.
> - Added an early exit in damon_do_apply_schemes() to prevent a scheme
> with zero esz from being evaluated by damos_quota_is_full().
> - Changed patch title, original title: always return false when esz is
> zero
>
> ---
> mm/damon/core.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index 8e3ded1a2cf6..de78ad56c8b3 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -2560,6 +2560,8 @@ static bool damos_quota_is_full(struct damos_quota *quota,
> {
> if (!damos_quota_is_set(quota))
> return false;
> + if (!quota->charged_sz)
> + return false;
> if (quota->charged_sz >= quota->esz)
> return true;
> /*
> @@ -2666,6 +2668,9 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
> if (!s->wmarks.activated)
> continue;
>
> + if (!quota->esz)
> + continue;
> +
> /* Check the quota */
> if (damos_quota_is_full(quota, c->min_region_sz))
> continue;
> --
> 2.55.0
>
>
Please ignore this patch. The title was truncated, so I've reposted it.
If Sashiko provides a report in this thread that differs from the
reposted version, I'll forward it as well.
Best regards,
Rui Yan