Re: [PATCH] kthread: remove worker->task self-assignment

[Bradley Morgan]

On 2 September 2026 15:09:05 BST, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Le Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 03:09:03PM +0100, Bradley Morgan a écrit :
>> On 1 September 2026 15:06:51 BST, Frederic Weisbecker
><frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> >Le Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:57:38PM +0100, Bradley Morgan a écrit :
>> >> On 1 September 2026 13:49:00 BST, Peter Zijlstra
><peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:45:43PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Le Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 04:18:48PM +0000, Bradley Morgan a écrit :
>> >> >> > From: Bradley Morgan <brads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > All kthread worker users now create their workers with
>> >> >> > kthread_create_worker*(), which sets worker->task before the
>worker
>> >> >> > starts. The self-assignment in kthread_worker_fn() is dead code
>> >now.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> How could it be created before?
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Remove it.
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <brads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> > ---
>> >> >> >  kernel/kthread.c | 7 -------
>> >> >> >  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>> >> >> > 
>> >> >> > diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
>> >> >> > index 63beb59b7a3d..18bc702e8d2d 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/kernel/kthread.c
>> >> >> > +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
>> >> >> > @@ -987,13 +987,6 @@ int kthread_worker_fn(void *worker_ptr)
>> >> >> >  	struct kthread_worker *worker = worker_ptr;
>> >> >> >  	struct kthread_work *work;
>> >> >> >  
>> >> >> > -	/*
>> >> >> > -	 * FIXME: Update the check and remove the assignment when all kthread
>> >> >> > -	 * worker users are created using kthread_create_worker*() functions.
>> >> >> > -	 */
>> >> >> > -	WARN_ON(worker->task && worker->task != current);
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Should we keep a WARN_ON(worker->task != current) here?
>> >> >
>> >> >I vote yes! Paranoia is good :-)
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Yeah, but it *should* be useless.
>> >
>> >Famous last words :-)
>> >
>> 
>> Hahahaha
>> 
>> >> Do you really want me to readd the warn
>> >> statement? Maybe add some text, like
>> >> 
>> >> "worker->task is deprecated"?
>> >
>> >Is it deprecated? We still need that field for wakeup on queue at
>least.
>> >Don't bother with a message, it's only a sanity check.
>> 
>> Okie, I did convert all the drivers as you can see, if you wanna give it
>a
>> lookie
>
>Do you have a link to that?
>
>Thanks.

uhh, they should be all in-reply-tos, so if you search for my series in
lore, this patch replies to all of the conversions




>
>> 
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> --- Thanks!
>> >>
>>
>>https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@xxxxxxxxx/
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> --- Thanks!
>>
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@xxxxxxxxx/
>
>

--- Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@xxxxxxxxx/