Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/crash: reserve elfcorehdr for CONFIG_NR_CPUS, not CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT

[Bradley Morgan]

On 2 September 2026 22:34:09 BST, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>On 9/2/26 14:27, Bradley Morgan wrote:
>> On 2 September 2026 22:24:16 BST, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> On 9/1/26 00:10, Ionut Nechita (Wind River) wrote:
>>>> Assisted-by: LLM
>>> This seems a _bit_ opaque and imprecise. Could you take a quick look
>>> through:
>>>
>>> https://docs.kernel.org/process/generated-content.html
>>>
>>> and try to err a bit more on the side of transparency for the next one?
>> 
>> Spoiler: new rule added in the docs, you no longer need to do
>Provider:Modelname any longer
>
>I'm just saying, for me, "Assisted-by: LLM" is almost worthless. I'm not
>going to go tilting at any windmills to get that doc changed, but it
>seems a borderline waste of bytes.
>

True, people argued that nobody cared what extras you used, all they needed
to
know is what the base you used is. E.g: LLM

>Please just say how you used the tools. At least for things you want me
>to merge.

Maybe a --- line note could be good?

E.g:

(Patch)
---
I used a LLM (Claude code?) to (discover, build, etc?) the patch.

 Yes, I owe an Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst update
>for this.


Want me to do it? Or could you cc me

--- Thanks!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/EE579805-42F2-4C58-B752-F28779EEB717@xxxxxxxxx/