Re: [PATCH RESEND] drm/sched: Create faux device for KUnit tests

From: Maxime Ripard

Date: Thu Sep 03 2026 - 05:47:08 EST


Hi,

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 05:02:56PM +0800, oushixiong1025@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The DRM scheduler KUnit tests currently pass NULL for the dev field in
> drm_sched_init_args, which causes a NULL pointer dereference in the
> drm_sched_job trace event when it calls dev_name() on sched->dev.
>
> Use faux_device_create() to create a fake device for the mock scheduler,
> so the scheduler always has a valid device pointer. This avoids the
> trace event crash without requiring the production code to accept a NULL
> device pointer, which conceptually makes no sense for a scheduler.
>
> An atomic counter is used to generate unique device names, since
> multiple mock schedulers can exist simultaneously across different
> test suites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shixiong Ou <oushixiong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/sched_tests.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
> index 14403a762335..cd87e405bb1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/mock_scheduler.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> /* Copyright (c) 2025 Valve Corporation */
>
> +#include <linux/device/faux.h>
> +
> #include "sched_tests.h"
>
> /*
> @@ -10,6 +12,8 @@
> * Test cases are implemented in a separate file.
> */
>
> +static atomic_t drm_mock_sched_instance = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +
> /**
> * drm_mock_sched_entity_new - Create a new mock scheduler entity
> *
> @@ -296,11 +300,20 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler *drm_mock_sched_new(struct kunit *test, long timeout)
> .name = "drm-mock-scheduler",
> };
> struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched;
> + char name[64];
> int ret;
>
> sched = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*sched), GFP_KERNEL);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sched);
>
> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "drm-mock-scheduler-%d",
> + atomic_inc_return(&drm_mock_sched_instance));
> +
> + sched->faux_dev = faux_device_create(name, NULL, NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, sched->faux_dev);
> +
> + args.dev = &sched->faux_dev->dev;
> +
> ret = drm_sched_init(&sched->base, &args);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
> @@ -323,6 +336,7 @@ struct drm_mock_scheduler *drm_mock_sched_new(struct kunit *test, long timeout)
> void drm_mock_sched_fini(struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched)
> {
> drm_sched_fini(&sched->base);
> + faux_device_destroy(sched->faux_dev);
> }

What's wrong with drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(), or kunit_device_register()?

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature