Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] of: property: fw_devlink: Follow GPIO nexus maps
From: Ernest Van Hoecke
Date: Thu Sep 03 2026 - 07:52:07 EST
On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 11:57:58AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello Ernest,
>
> On 02/09/2026 at 18:55:13 +02, Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ernest, Bartosz,
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 15:22:36 +0200
> > Ernest Van Hoecke <ernestvanhoecke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 05:30:19AM -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 13:41:39 +0200, Ernest Van Hoecke
> >> > <ernestvanhoecke@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >> > > From: Ernest Van Hoecke <ernest.vanhoecke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > >
> >> > > GPIO consumers use of_parse_phandle_with_args_map() to resolve specifiers
> >> > > through gpio-map properties. fw_devlink instead parses GPIO properties as
> >> >
> >> > Unlike PWM, there's no such thing as "gpio-map" properties.
>
> Just as an FYI, there is a pending series to extend the nexus
> node concept to clocks, this may also require some fw-devlink magic :-)
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20260807-schneider-v7-2-rc1-eip201-upstream-v5-0-8785f9531cf0@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m16ddef087544db31b5f434fa44be70aad0b5e37e
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
Hi Miquèl,
That's the reason I put you in cc and also the reason I went for new
NEXUS macros in this series. Clock would hopefully be the next consumer
of that :)
I should've mentioned that more explicitly in my cover letter. Your work
on the clock nexus can certainly come in handy for us, thanks for your
input.
Kind regards,
Ernest